Deep learning to detect anterior cruciate ligament tear on knee MRI: multi-continental external validation
- PMID: 35726103
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08923-z
Deep learning to detect anterior cruciate ligament tear on knee MRI: multi-continental external validation
Abstract
Objectives: To develop a deep-learning algorithm for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear detection and to compare its accuracy using two external datasets.
Methods: A database of 19,765 knee MRI scans (17,738 patients) issued from different manufacturers and magnetic fields was used to build a deep learning-based ACL tear detector. Fifteen percent showed partial or complete ACL rupture. Coronal and sagittal fat-suppressed proton density or T2-weighted sequences were used. A Natural Language Processing algorithm was used to automatically label reports associated with each MRI exam. We compared the accuracy of our model on two publicly available external datasets: MRNet, Bien et al, USA (PLoS Med 15:e1002699, 2018); and KneeMRI, Stajduhar et al, Croatia (Comput Methods Prog Biomed 140:151-164, 2017). Receptor operating characteristics (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were used to evaluate our model.
Results: Our neural networks achieved an AUC value of 0.939 for detection of ACL tears, with a sensitivity of 87% (0.875) and a specificity of 91% (0.908). After retraining our model on Bien dataset and Stajduhar dataset, our algorithm achieved AUC of 0.962 (95% CI 0.930-0.988) and 0.922 (95% CI 0.875, 0.962) respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were respectively 85% (95% CI 75-94%, 0.852), 89% (95% CI 82-97%, 0.894), 0.875 (95% CI 0.817-0.933) for Bien dataset, and 68% (95% CI 54-81%, 0.681), 93% (95% CI 89-97%, 0.934), and 0.870 (95% CI 0.821-0.913) for Stajduhar dataset.
Conclusion: Our algorithm showed high performance in the detection of ACL tears with AUC on two external datasets, demonstrating its generalizability on different manufacturers and populations. This study shows the performance of an algorithm for detecting anterior cruciate ligament tears with an external validation on populations from countries and continents different from the study population.
Key points: • An algorithm for detecting anterior cruciate ligament ruptures was built from a large dataset of nearly 20,000 MRI with AUC values of 0.939, sensitivity of 87%, and specificity of 91%. • This algorithm was tested on two external populations from different other countries: a dataset from an American population and a dataset from a Croatian population. Performance remains high on these two external validation populations (AUC of 0.962 and 0.922 respectively).
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Knee injuries; Magnetic resonance imaging.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
Similar articles
-
Deep-learning-assisted diagnosis for knee magnetic resonance imaging: Development and retrospective validation of MRNet.PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 27;15(11):e1002699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002699. eCollection 2018 Nov. PLoS Med. 2018. PMID: 30481176 Free PMC article.
-
Deep learning-assisted detection of meniscus and anterior cruciate ligament combined tears in adult knee magnetic resonance imaging: a crossover study with arthroscopy correlation.Int Orthop. 2025 Jul;49(7):1689-1697. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06531-2. Epub 2025 Apr 28. Int Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40293511
-
Deep Learning for Detection of Complete Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear.J Digit Imaging. 2019 Dec;32(6):980-986. doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00193-4. J Digit Imaging. 2019. PMID: 30859341 Free PMC article.
-
Knee Ligament Sprains: Diagnosing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries by Patient Interview. Development and Evaluation of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Score (ACLIS).Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 May;108(3):103257. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103257. Epub 2022 Feb 24. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022. PMID: 35219887 Review.
-
A Systematic Review on Deep Learning Model in Computer-aided Diagnosis for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.Curr Med Imaging. 2024;20:e15734056295157. doi: 10.2174/0115734056295157240418043624. Curr Med Imaging. 2024. PMID: 38721794
Cited by
-
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Detection Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Sep 26;12(10):2314. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102314. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36292003 Free PMC article.
-
How AI May Transform Musculoskeletal Imaging.Radiology. 2024 Jan;310(1):e230764. doi: 10.1148/radiol.230764. Radiology. 2024. PMID: 38165245 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Deep Learning Models to Detect Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury on MRI: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 19;15(6):776. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15060776. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40150118 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Artificial intelligence in orthopedics: fundamentals, current applications, and future perspectives.Mil Med Res. 2025 Aug 4;12(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40779-025-00633-z. Mil Med Res. 2025. PMID: 40754583 Free PMC article. Review.
-
MGACA-Net: a novel deep learning based multi-scale guided attention and context aggregation for localization of knee anterior cruciate ligament tears region in MRI images.PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Jul 13;9:e1483. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1483. eCollection 2023. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023. PMID: 37547408 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources