Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;78(4):207-212.
doi: 10.1159/000525367. Epub 2022 Jun 21.

Comparison of Methods for Cleaning Enteral Feeding Tube Junctions of the New International Standard (ISO 80369-3)

Affiliations

Comparison of Methods for Cleaning Enteral Feeding Tube Junctions of the New International Standard (ISO 80369-3)

Hiroaki Koya et al. Ann Nutr Metab. 2022.

Abstract

Introduction: International standards for enteral feeding involving the use of feeding tubes with junctions have been introduced. If these junctions are not properly cleaned, they can become contaminated, leading to microbial infections. We aimed to compare the ease and effectiveness of cleaning of four methods using the number of bacteria.

Methods: We compared enteral nutrition tube junctions cleaned using four methods such as water, toothbrush, cotton swab, and EnClean® brush with an uncleaned control. Once daily for 7 days, the tubes were injected with nutrients, cleaned, and incubated at 37°C. Samples for bacterial culture were collected before injections on days 7, 14, 21, and 28. The culture samples were incubated at 37°C for 48 h, and the number of colonies was counted.

Results: The number of residual bacteria on day 28 did not differ between the four cleaning methods and the control group. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in bacterial counts among the four wash methods. The number of washes did not differ among cleaning methods.

Conclusion: The bacterial count in the ISO-standardized tube junction increased, and none of the cleaning methods decreased the counts.

Keywords: Bacteria; Cleaning; EnClean®; Enteral feeding; ISO 80369-3.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest regarding this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Residual bacterial counts. The number of residual bacteria after each washing method at each culture time in experiments 1 and 2. The y-axis represents the logarithm of the number of bacteria. The x-axis shows the sampling day. The error bars represent the maximum and minimum values.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Pharmaceuticals and medical devices safety information [Internet] Tokyo. 2022. [cited 2021 May 3] Available from: https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000231482.pdf.
    1. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Introduction of Connectors to Prevent Misconnection (for enteral Applications) [Internet] Tokyo. 2022. [cited 2021 May 3] Available from: https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000230636.pdf.
    1. Zanetti M. Module 8.1 indications, contraindications, complications and monitoring of EN [Internet] Italy. 2020. [cited 2021 May 3] Available from: https://lllnutrition.com/mod/page/view.php?id=3926.
    1. Lyman B, Rahe KL, Keeler D, Sherman AK, Abdelhadi RA. Randomized controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of two cleaning regimens for ENFit® connectors. Medsurg Nurs. 2020 Nov/Dec;29((6)):401–406.
    1. Anderson KR, Norris DJ, Godfrey LB, Avent CK, Butterworth CE. Bacterial contamination of tube-feeding formulas. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1984 Nov/Dec;8((6)):673–678. - PubMed

Publication types