Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jul:189:109969.
doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109969. Epub 2022 Jun 18.

A randomized clinical trial of genetic testing and personalized risk counselling in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving integrated care -The genetic testing and patient empowerment (GEM) trial

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized clinical trial of genetic testing and personalized risk counselling in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving integrated care -The genetic testing and patient empowerment (GEM) trial

Ronald Ching Wan Ma et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Jul.
Free article

Abstract

Aims: We evaluated the effect of personalized risk counseling incorporating clinical and genetic risk factors on patient empowerment and risk factor control in diabetes.

Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with suboptimal glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7.5%) were randomized to a genetic counselling (GC) or control group. All patients underwent genetic testing for alleles at three loci associated with diabetic complications. The GC group received additional explanation of the joint associations of genetic and modifiable risk factors on risk of complications. All patients were reassessed at 12 months including validated questionnaires for patient reported outcomes. The primary outcome was proportion of patients reaching ≥ 3 of 5 predefined treatment targets (HbA1c < 7%, BP < 130/80 mmHg, LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L, Triglyceride < 2.0 mmol/L, use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors). Secondary outcomes included new-onset chronic kidney disease or microalbuminuria and patient reported outcome measures.

Results: A total of 435 patients were randomized and 420 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. At 12 months, the proportion of patients who attained ≥ 3 targets increased from 41.6% to 52.3% in the GC group (p = 0.007) versus 49.5% to 62.6% in the control group (p = 0.003), without between-group difference. Both groups had similar reduction in HbA1c, LDL-C and increased use of medications. In per protocol analysis, the GC group had higher diabetes empowerment, with reduced diabetes distress. In the GC group, the greatest improvement in positive attitude and self-care activities was observed in the intermediate to high genetic risk score (GRS) groups.

Conclusions: In patients with T2D receiving integrated care, additional counselling on genetic risk of complications did not further improve risk factor control, although the improvement in self-efficacy warrants long-term evaluation.

Keywords: Diabetic kidney disease; Genetics; Genomics; Precision medicine; Precision prognostics; Type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types