Peer-reviewed process: is everything valid?

Affiliations

¹ Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain; Department of Ophthalmology, Vithas Medimar International Hospital, Alicante, Spain. Electronic address: david.pinyero@ua.es.

Editorial

David P Piñero. J Optom. 2022 Jul-Sep.

. 2022 Jul-Sep;15(3):189-190.

doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2022.06.001.

¹ Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain; Department of Ophthalmology, Vithas Medimar International Hospital, Alicante, Spain. Electronic address: david.pinyero@ua.es.

No abstract available

Comment on

Influence of Author's Gender on the Peer-Review Process in Vision Science.
Jiménez-García M, Buruklar H, Consejo A, Dragnea DC, Fambuena I, Hershko S, Issarti I, Kreps EO, Van Acker SI, Ní Dhubhghaill S, Koppen C, Rozema JJ. Jiménez-García M, et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;240:115-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.02.017. Epub 2022 Feb 25. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35227698

1. Smith R. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. J R Soc Med. 2006;99:178–182. - PMC - PubMed
1. van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, Black N, Smith R. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers’ recommendations: a randomised trial. BMJ. 1999;318(7175):23–27. - PMC - PubMed
1. Kelly J, Sadeghieh T, Adeli K. Peer review in scientific publications: benefits, critiques & a survival guide. EJIFCC. 2014;25:227–243. - PMC - PubMed
1. Wilcox C Rude paper reviews are pervasive and sometimes harmful. Available at: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/12/rude-paper-reviews-are-pervasive.... Accessed 6 Jun 2022. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba5502.
1. Jiménez-García M, Buruklar H, Consejo A, Dragnea DC, Fambuena I, Hershko S, Issarti I, Kreps EO, Van Acker SI, Ní Dhubhghaill S, Koppen C, Rozema JJ. Influence of author's gender on the peer-review process in vision science. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;240:115–124. - PubMed