Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Oct;29(5):879-885.
doi: 10.1007/s10140-022-02071-z. Epub 2022 Jun 21.

Impact of the COVID pandemic on emergency department CT utilization: where do we go from here?

Affiliations
Observational Study

Impact of the COVID pandemic on emergency department CT utilization: where do we go from here?

Timothy M Loftus et al. Emerg Radiol. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID) pandemic on emergency department (ED) computed tomography (CT) utilization.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted assessing seven hospitals' ED imaging volumes between Jan. 6, 2019, and Feb. 27, 2021. Weekly CT utilization is reported as CTs ordered per 100 ED visits. Utilization was ascertained in aggregate and by body area. Interrupted time series analysis was performed to assess significance of utilization change. Prespecified sensitivity analysis was performed for influenza-like or COVID-like illness (ILI/CLI).

Results: Weekly ED CT utilization increased from 35.9 CTs per 100 visits (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 35.8-36.1) to 41.8 per 100 visits (95% CI 41.7-42.0) in pre- and post-pandemic periods. Weekly ED CT chest utilization increased immediately following the pandemic declaration (+ 0.52 chest CTs per 100 ED visits, 95% CI 0.01-1.03, p < 0.05) and compared to pre-pandemic period (+ 0.02 per 100 ED visits, 95% CI 0.02-0.05, p < 0.02). For both CT abdomen/pelvis and CT head, there was neither an immediate effect (+ 0.34 CT-AP per 100 ED visits, 95% CI - 0.74 to 1.44, p = 0.89; - 0.42 CT-H per 100 ED visits, 95% CI - 1.53 to 0.70, p = 0.46) nor a change in weekly CT utilization (+ 0.03 CT-AP per 100 ED visits, 95% CI - 0.01 to 0.05, p = 0.09; + 0.03 CT-H per 100 ED visits, 95% CI - 0.01 to 0.06, p = 0.10). CONCLUSION: These data may help formulate future strategies for resource utilization and imaging operations as we envision a future with COVID and other federal mandates affecting imaging utilization and appropriateness.

Keywords: COVID-19; Clinical operations; Computed tomography; Emergency department; Emergency radiology; Imaging utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CT utilization and COVID + cases over time. CT utilization, defined as number of CTs ordered per 100 visits, is plotted in blue. The number of COVID + cases per 100 ED visits is plotted on the secondary y axis on the dotted line. Weekly adjusted ED CT utilization increased from 35.9 CTs per 100 visits (35.8–36.1) in pre-pandemic to 41.8 CTs per 100 visits (41.7–42.0) in post-pandemic period
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Interrupted time series analysis of weekly CT chest utilization per 100 ED visits. Weekly ED CT chest utilization adjusted for sex, age, admit rate, and ED length of stay. Prior to the pandemic declaration during the week of 3/8/20 (Week 62), there was no significant change in the weekly ED CT chest utilization. In the first week following the pandemic declaration, there was an immediate significant increase in ED CT chest utilization (+ 0.52 chest CTs per 100 ED visits, 95% CI 0.01–1.03, p < 0.05) and a significant increase in the pandemic weekly rate of ED CT chest utilization compared to the pre-pandemic period (+ 0.02 chest CTs per 100 ED visits, 95% CI 0.02–0.05, p < 0.02). Mean weekly ED CT chest utilization reached a bimodal peak during the post-pandemic period of 7.05 and 8.56 CTs per 100 ED visits during the weeks of 4/19/20 and 11/15/20, respectively
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Interrupted time series analysis of weekly CT chest utilization per 100 ED visits among ED visits suspected to have influenza-like or COVID-like illness. In the first week following the pandemic declaration (week 62), there was an immediate significant increase in ED CT chest utilization (+ 0.77 chest CTs per 100 ED visits, 95% CI 0.14–1.40, p-0.02), and in the following weeks, there was a significant increase in the pandemic weekly rate of ED CT chest utilization compared to the pre-pandemic period (+ 0.04 chest CTs per 100 ED visits, 95% CI 0.02–0.06, p < 0.0001). Although weekly CT chest utilization in this sensitivity analysis cohort reached bimodal peaks coinciding with the trends observed in the main analysis (Fig. 3; 5.45 and 7.64 CTs per 100 ED visits during the weeks of 4/19/20 and 11/15/20, respectively), CT utilization notably decreased in the weeks between these bimodal peaks to a level below that of the pre-pandemic rate (nadir 2.68 CTs per 100 ED visits on 8/30/20)

References

    1. Ghebreyesus T (2020) World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19. 11 March 2020. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-genera.... Accessed 1 May 2021
    1. Azar A (2020) US Department of Health and Human Services - Determination that a public health emergency exists - Jan 31, 2020. https://www.phe.gov/emergency/news/healthactions/phe/Pages/2019-nCoV.aspx. Accessed 15 May 2021
    1. Pritzker JB (2020) Gubernatorial disaster proclamation regarding COVID-19 - March 9,2020. https://www.illinois.gov/content/dam/soi/en/web/illinois/documents/gover.... Accessed 15 May 2021
    1. Cohen BA, Wessling EG, Serina PT, Cruz DS, Kim HS, McCarthy DM, Loftus TM. Emergency department operations in a large health system during COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;41:241–243. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.097. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barten DG, Latten GHP, van Osch FHM (2022) Reduced emergency department utilization during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: viral fear or lockdown effect? Disaster Med Public Health Prep 16(1):6–39. 10.1017/dmp.2020.303 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types