Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 21;15(1):216.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06094-0.

Leveling up evidence syntheses: filling conceptual gaps of the role of midwifery in health systems through a network analysis

Cristina A Mattison  1   2 , Kirsty Bourret  3   4 , Michelle L Dion  5
Affiliations

Leveling up evidence syntheses: filling conceptual gaps of the role of midwifery in health systems through a network analysis

Cristina A Mattison et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Objective: In the research note, our main objective is to explore the value of combining an evidence synthesis with a network analysis. The discussion is based on a critical interpretive synthesis, which combines systematic review methodology with qualitive inquiry, and 'research concept' network analysis focused on understanding the roles of midwives in health systems. The interpretative analytic approach of a critical interpretive synthesis has a high explanatory value by allowing for the review of a diverse body of literature and is well-suited to delving into areas that are not well understood, such as midwifery.

Results: Network analyses use graphs to represent relationships between concepts and brought to light important additional insights into the literature that were not present in the evidence synthesis alone. Given the lack of theoretical development in the area of midwifery in health systems, the critical interpretive synthesis allowed for the generation of concepts used to inform a theoretical framework, while the novel application of an exploratory network analysis deepened understanding of conceptual areas of saturation within the field, as well as identifying critical gaps in the literature.

Keywords: Critical interpretive synthesis; Evidence synthesis; Health policy; Health systems; Midwifery; Mixed methods; Network analysis; Sexual and reproductive health and rights.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Network analysis of governance arrangements found in the literature on the roles of midwives in health systems
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Network analysis of financial arrangements found in the literature on the roles of midwives in health systems
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Network analysis of delivery arrangements found in the literature on the roles of midwives in health systems
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Network analysis of implementation strategies found in the literature on the roles of midwives in health systems
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Booth A, Noyes J, Flemming K, Gerhardus A, Wahlster P, Van Der Wilt GJ, et al. Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions. Bremen (DE): Integrate-HTA. 2016. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298743768_Guidance_on_choosing_...
    1. Kastner M, Antony J, Soobiah C, Straus SE, Tricco AC. Conceptual recommendations for selecting the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to answer research questions related to complex evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;73:43–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.11.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones DR, Miller T, Sutton AJ, et al. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qual Res. 2006;6(1):27–44. doi: 10.1177/1468794106058867. - DOI
    1. Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6(1):35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-35. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moat KA, Lavis JN, Abelson J. How contexts and issues influence the use of policy-relevant research syntheses: a critical interpretive synthesis. Milbank Q. 2013;91(3):604–648. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12026. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources