Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 29;289(1977):20220782.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0782. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

Background selection under evolving recombination rates

Affiliations

Background selection under evolving recombination rates

Tom R Booker et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Background selection (BGS), the effect that purifying selection exerts on sites linked to deleterious alleles, is expected to be ubiquitous across eukaryotic genomes. The effects of BGS reflect the interplay of the rates and fitness effects of deleterious mutations with recombination. A fundamental assumption of BGS models is that recombination rates are invariant over time. However, in some lineages, recombination rates evolve rapidly, violating this central assumption. Here, we investigate how recombination rate evolution affects genetic variation under BGS. We show that recombination rate evolution modifies the effects of BGS in a manner similar to a localized change in the effective population size, potentially leading to underestimation or overestimation of the genome-wide effects of selection. Furthermore, we find evidence that recombination rate evolution in the ancestors of modern house mice may have impacted inferences of the genome-wide effects of selection in that species.

Keywords: Mus musculus; background selection; chromosomal rearrangements; evolutionary genetics; recombination rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The effect of BGS on nucleotide diversity (π) over time after recombination rates change by a factor λ. The dashed lines were calculated using equation (2.1) and formulae from Nordborg et al. [32]. Points indicate the mean from 50 replicate simulations. Nucleotide diversity was calculated for neutral sites 10 000 bp away from sites subject to purifying selection. Points are shown with error bars indicating ± 1 standard error. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Spearman's correlation between nucleotide diversity (π) and recombination rate (r) over time after recombination rates evolve; (a) shows results for a broad-scale shift in the recombination landscape and (b) shows results for recombination rate evolution by the movement of hotspots. Results are shown for 10 kbp analysis windows. (Online version in colour.)

References

    1. Charlesworth B. 2009. Fundamental concepts in genetics: effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 195-205. (10.1038/nrg2526) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Charlesworth B, Morgan MT, Charlesworth D. 1993. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134, 1289-1303. (10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD. 2007. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 610-618. (10.1038/nrg2146) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Comeron JM. 2017. Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges from Drosophila studies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 372, 1736. (10.1098/rstb.2016.0471) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johri P, Charlesworth B, Jensen JD. 2020. Toward an evolutionarily appropriate null model: jointly inferring demography and purifying selection. Genetics 215, 173-192. (10.1534/genetics.119.303002) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources