Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 1;34(4):265-269.
doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000840. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

Question prompt lists to improve communication between cancer patients and healthcare professionals

Johanna Terrasson  1 , Aude Rault  1 , Sylvie Dolbeault  1   2 , Anne Brédart  1   3
Affiliations
Review

Question prompt lists to improve communication between cancer patients and healthcare professionals

Johanna Terrasson et al. Curr Opin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: This literature review sets out to summarize knowledge on the impact of question prompt lists (QPLs) on patient-physician communication in oncology and to provide an account of current research on the development, adaptation, and implementation of this type of communication tool.

Recent findings: Provided with a QPL, patients seem to ask more questions, in particular on sensitive issues like those around the end-of-life period and they recall the information provided better. There is a need to adapt QPLs, taking account of divergences in attitudes towards illness, participation in decision-making, and discussions about the illness prognosis across cultures. QPLs may also need to be tailored to specific concerns of patients at the different stages in the care trajectory and to the particularities of each cancer type. These adaptations contribute to the effectiveness of the tool because they make it possible to tailor it to the challenges and constraints experienced in clinical practice.

Summary: QPLs are designed to enhance patients' communication with their physicians. Further research is required to develop QPLs suited to each cultural and clinical setting, involving health professionals so as to facilitate the implementation of these tools in routine practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sisk B, Schulz G, Mack J, et al. Communication interventions in adult and pediatric oncology: a scoping review and analysis of behavioral targets. PLoS ONE 2019; 14:1–37.
    1. Terrasson J, Brédart A, El Mellah L, et al. Enjeux émotionnels de la communication parents-pédiatre lors de l’annonce de mauvaises nouvelles en oncologie pédiatrique: un état de la question. Bull Cancer 2021; 108:399–414.
    1. van Osch M, van Dulmen S, van Vliet L, Bensing J. Specifying the effects of physician's communication on patients’ outcomes: a randomised controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2017; 100:1482–1489.
    1. Zachariae R, Pedersen C, Jensen A, et al. Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. Br J Cancer 2003; 88:658–665.
    1. Clayton J, Hancock K, Parker S, et al. Sustaining hope when communicating with terminally ill patients and their families: a systematic review. Psychooncology 2008; 17:641–659.

Publication types