Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 14;65(13):8699-8712.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00473. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

Rings in Clinical Trials and Drugs: Present and Future

Affiliations
Review

Rings in Clinical Trials and Drugs: Present and Future

Jonathan Shearer et al. J Med Chem. .

Abstract

We present a comprehensive analysis of all ring systems (both heterocyclic and nonheterocyclic) in clinical trial compounds and FDA-approved drugs. We show 67% of small molecules in clinical trials comprise only ring systems found in marketed drugs, which mirrors previously published findings for newly approved drugs. We also show there are approximately 450 000 unique ring systems derived from 2.24 billion molecules currently available in synthesized chemical space, and molecules in clinical trials utilize only 0.1% of this available pool. Moreover, there are fewer ring systems in drugs compared with those in clinical trials, but this is balanced by the drug ring systems being reused more often. Furthermore, systematic changes of up to two atoms on existing drug and clinical trial ring systems give a set of 3902 future clinical trial ring systems, which are predicted to cover approximately 50% of the novel ring systems entering clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of predicted size of chemical space and key comparisons. Some images were sourced from third parties: “Stars in universe”, permission given by NASA; “Grains of sand on Earth”, permission given by FreeImages; “FDA Approved Drugs”, permission given by FreeImages; “Miles to Alpha Centauri”, permission given by European Southern Observatory (ESO), Davide De Martin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of rings, ring systems, and frameworks for Chlorthalidone.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Histogram comparisons of ring systems in drugs, clinical trials, and those exclusively in drugs that are not currently in clinical trials for (a) number of rings per ring system, (b) percentage of heteroatoms per ring system, (c) percentage of nitrogens per ring system, (d) percentage of oxygens per ring system, (e) percentage of sulfurs per ring system, and (f) percentage of sp3 centers per ring system.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Summary of molecular ring systems (scaffolds) in drugs, clinical trials, reported/synthesized chemical space, and predicted future clinical trial ring systems.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Average number of vectors used per ring vs number of rings per ring system for sets of molecules from drugs and clinical trials. Error bars are the standard deviation of each distribution.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Network diagram showing how ring systems are connected in (a) all compounds in clinical trials. Color of the node represents the highest phase that each ring system can be found. Key: Phase 1 = blue, Phase 2 = green, Phase 3 = purple; drugs = black. (b) Network diagram depicting ring systems in clinical trials that are commonly found in kinase inhibitors (blue nodes); remaining black nodes are all other ring systems present in clinical trials. Central node of the top left cluster (largest cluster) in each subfigure represents benzene.

References

    1. Bero S. A.; Muda A. K.; Choo Y. H.; Muda N. A.; Pratama S. F. Similarity Measure for Molecular Structure: A Brief Review. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 892, 012015.10.1088/1742-6596/892/1/012015. - DOI
    1. Willett P.Similarity Searching Using 2D Structural Fingerprints. In Chemoinformatics and Computational Chemical Biology; Bajorath J., Ed.; Methods in Molecular Biology; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, 2011; pp 133–158. 10.1007/978-1-60761-839-3_5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bickerton G. R.; Paolini G. V.; Besnard J.; Muresan S.; Hopkins A. L. Quantifying the Chemical Beauty of Drugs. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4 (2), 90–98. 10.1038/nchem.1243. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gillet V. J.; Willett P.; Bradshaw J. Identification of Biological Activity Profiles Using Substructural Analysis and Genetic Algorithms †. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38 (2), 165–179. 10.1021/ci970431+. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin E. J.; Critchlow R. E. Beyond Mere Diversity: Tailoring Combinatorial Libraries for Drug Discovery. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1 (1), 32–45. 10.1021/cc9800024. - DOI - PubMed