Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2022 Oct;32(10):6977-6978.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08944-8. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

Incidental findings in brain imaging research: spotlight on ethical considerations

Sonu M M Bhaskar  1   2   3   4
Affiliations
Editorial

Incidental findings in brain imaging research: spotlight on ethical considerations

Sonu M M Bhaskar. Eur Radiol. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Brain imaging has revolutionized our ability to characterize brain structure and function. Since the first use of magnetic resonance imaging in a live human subject in 1977, the use of brain imaging in research and clinical medicine has seen exponential growth. Incidental findings (IFs) in brain imaging research have been a subject of contentious debate regarding the disclosure of IFs to human participants of research. In this paper, ethical considerations, as they apply, to IFs in brain imaging research have been discussed. KEY POINTS: • Ethical considerations merit discussion vis a vis disclosure of incidental findings in brain imaging research.

Keywords: Ethics; Health equity; Incidental findings; Neuroimaging; Neuroscience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Illes J (2006) ‘Pandora’s box’ of incidental findings in brain imaging research. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2:60–61 - DOI
    1. Deslauriers C, Bell E, Palmour N, Pike B, Doyon J, Racine E (2010) Perspectives of Canadian researchers on ethics review of neuroimaging research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 5:49–66 - DOI
    1. Graham M, Hallowell N, Savulescu J (2021) A just standard: the ethical management of incidental findings in brain imaging research. J Law Med Ethics 49:269–281 - DOI
    1. Murphy N, Weijer C (2021) Grey matter – the problems of incidental findings in neuroimaging research. J Law Med Ethics 49:282–284 - DOI
    1. Wardlaw JM, Davies H, Booth TC et al (2015) Acting on incidental findings in research imaging. BMJ 351:h5190

LinkOut - more resources