Evolution in Care Delivery within Critical Illness Recovery Programs during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study
- PMID: 35731631
- PMCID: PMC9667813
- DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202203-255OC
Evolution in Care Delivery within Critical Illness Recovery Programs during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study
Abstract
Rationale: There are limited data on the impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on intensive care unit (ICU) recovery clinic care delivery practices. Objectives: We sought to better understand the patient-level factors affecting ICU recovery clinic care and changing clinical thinking during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also sought to understand how the COVID-19 pandemic sparked innovation within ICU recovery clinics. Methods: A multicenter qualitative study was conducted with ICU recovery clinic interprofessional clinicians involved with the Critical and Acute Illness Recovery Organization (CAIRO) between February and March 2021. Data were collected using semistructured interviews and were analyzed using thematic analysis. Key themes were organized in a working analytical framework. Results: Twenty-nine participants from 15 international sites participated in the study. Participants identified three patient-level key themes that influenced care delivery in ICU recovery programs: 1) social isolation, 2) decreased emotional reserve in patients and families, and 3) substantial social care needs. Changes in ICU recovery clinic care delivery occurred at both the clinician level (e.g., growing awareness of healthcare disparities and inequities, recognition of financial effects of illness, refinement of communication skills, increased focus on reconstructing the illness narrative) and the practice level (e.g., expansion of care delivery modes, efforts to integrate social care) in response to each of the patient-level themes. Identified gaps in ICU recovery clinic care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic included a need for multidisciplinary team members, access to care issues (e.g., digital poverty, health insurance coverage, language barriers), and altered family engagement. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that addressing patient-level factors such as efforts to integrate social care, address financial needs, refine provider communication skills (e.g., empathic listening), and enhance focus on reconstructing the illness narrative became important priorities during the ICU recovery clinic visit during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also identified several ongoing gaps in ICU recovery clinic care delivery that highlight the need for interventions focused on the integration of social and clinic services for critical care survivors.
Keywords: COVID-19; ICU survivors; healthcare delivery; intensive care unit follow-up clinics; post–intensive care syndrome.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Palliative Care in Survivors of Critical Illness: A Qualitative Study of Post-Intensive Care Unit Program Clinicians.J Palliat Med. 2023 Dec;26(12):1644-1653. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0034. Epub 2023 Oct 13. J Palliat Med. 2023. PMID: 37831930 Free PMC article.
-
Voices from the Pandemic: A Qualitative Study of Family Experiences and Suggestions regarding the Care of Critically Ill Patients.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Apr;19(4):614-624. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202105-629OC. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022. PMID: 34436977 Free PMC article.
-
Posttraumatic stress phenomena in critical illness and intensive care survivors.Int Rev Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;33(8):691-698. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2021.2017863. Epub 2021 Dec 22. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 35412426
-
"You always think the worst …" Family members' experiences during the COVID-19 emergency: A qualitative descriptive study.Aust Crit Care. 2024 Jul;37(4):659-666. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2023.12.001. Epub 2024 Jan 4. Aust Crit Care. 2024. PMID: 38176994 Review.
-
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33599282 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Barriers to and Facilitators of Family Caregiving of Patients With COVID-19 Early in the Pandemic.Am J Crit Care. 2023 Nov 1;32(6):431-439. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2023364. Am J Crit Care. 2023. PMID: 37907378 Free PMC article.
-
Post-hospital recovery trajectories of family members of critically ill COVID-19 survivors: an international qualitative investigation.Intensive Care Med. 2023 Oct;49(10):1203-1211. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07202-9. Epub 2023 Sep 12. Intensive Care Med. 2023. PMID: 37698596 Free PMC article.
-
Could an integrated model of health and social care after critical illness reduce socioeconomic disparities in outcomes? A Bayesian analysis.BJA Open. 2024 Jan 31;9:100259. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100259. eCollection 2024 Mar. BJA Open. 2024. PMID: 38322488 Free PMC article.
-
Palliative Care in Survivors of Critical Illness: A Qualitative Study of Post-Intensive Care Unit Program Clinicians.J Palliat Med. 2023 Dec;26(12):1644-1653. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0034. Epub 2023 Oct 13. J Palliat Med. 2023. PMID: 37831930 Free PMC article.
-
Provision of follow-up services for survivors of COVID-19 critical illness: A UK national survey.J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 Jul 28:17511437251334354. doi: 10.1177/17511437251334354. Online ahead of print. J Intensive Care Soc. 2025. PMID: 40740409 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Huggins EL, Bloom SL, Stollings JL, Camp M, Sevin CM, Jackson JC. A clinic model: post–intensive care syndrome and post–intensive care syndrome–family. AACN Adv Crit Care . 2016;27:204–211. - PubMed
-
- Harvey MA, Davidson JE. Postintensive care syndrome: right care, right now . . . and later. Crit Care Med . 2016;44:381–385. - PubMed