Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 13;144(27):12020-12031.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c01950. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

Shielding Protection by Mesoporous Catalysts for Improving Plasma-Catalytic Ambient Ammonia Synthesis

Affiliations

Shielding Protection by Mesoporous Catalysts for Improving Plasma-Catalytic Ambient Ammonia Synthesis

Yaolin Wang et al. J Am Chem Soc. .

Abstract

Plasma catalysis is a promising technology for decentralized small-scale ammonia (NH3) synthesis under mild conditions using renewable energy, and it shows great potential as an alternative to the conventional Haber-Bosch process. To date, this emerging process still suffers from a low NH3 yield due to a lack of knowledge in the design of highly efficient catalysts and the in situ plasma-induced reverse reaction (i.e., NH3 decomposition). Here, we demonstrate that a bespoke design of supported Ni catalysts using mesoporous MCM-41 could enable efficient plasma-catalytic NH3 production at 35 °C and 1 bar with >5% NH3 yield at 60 kJ/L. Specifically, the Ni active sites were deliberately deposited on the external surface of MCM-41 to enhance plasma-catalyst interactions and thus NH3 production. The desorbed NH3 could then diffuse into the ordered mesopores of MCM-41 to be shielded from decomposition due to the absence of plasma discharge in the mesopores of MCM-41, that is, "shielding protection", thus driving the reaction forward effectively. This promising strategy sheds light on the importance of a rational design of catalysts specifically for improving plasma-catalytic processes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HRTEM image and PSD of (a) Ni/MCM-out, (b) Ni/MCM-both, and (c) Ni/MCM-in (all in the reduced state).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) H2-TPR of the as-prepared Ni/MCM-out, Ni/MCM-both, and Ni/MCM-in, and the corresponding TEM images for out (α), window-like (β), and in (γ) Ni sites; (b) H2 consumption (by TPR) for the as-prepared catalysts (-a) and the H2 plasma-treated catalysts (-p) (at a specific energy input, SEI, of 24 kJ/L, SEI = plasma discharge power over gas flow rate); and (c) schematics of the supported Ni catalysts on MCM-41 (top) and shielding effect of mesoporous MCM-41 on Ni species within its mesopores in an H2 plasma discharge.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) RNH3 and NH3 yield of plasma alone and plasma-catalytic systems (with SiO2, MCM-41 and catalysts based on them, SEI = 36 kJ/L, Qgas = 40 mL/min, at 35 °C and 1 bar. Each experiment lasted 3 h). (Errors were derived from three tests under the same condition). (b) Turnover frequency (TOF, of plasma-catalytic systems) as a function of SEI. (c) Logarithmic reaction rate (ln(RNH3)) vs 1/discharge powerDBD plots for the plasma alone and hybrid systems (based on the MCM-41 support and Ni/MCM-41 catalysts). (d) RNH3 over Ni/MCM-out as a function of ToS for 150 h (The continuous sampling interval is 20 s). (e) Reported energy yield vs NH3 concentration in the plasma-catalytic NH3 synthesis over different metallic catalysts using DBD. Plotted experimental data are reproduced from the works of Bai et al., Barboun et al., Gómez-Ramírez et al., Herrera et al., Iwamoto et al.,, Kim et al., Li et al., Mizushima et al.,, Patil et al., Peng et al.,,, Shah et al.,, Wang et al., Xie et al., and Zhu et al.
Figure 4
Figure 4
In situ FTIR spectra of (a) N2 activation and adsorption (in N2 plasma, Qgas = 40 mL/min) and (b) hydrogenation of the adsorbed N2 (in an H2 plasma, Qgas = 40 mL/min) at 5 min of discharge time. (c) IR spectra of plasma-assisted ammonia synthesis (discharge time = 15 min, Qgas = 40 mL/min, N2/H2 = 1:3, full scale as shown in Figure S17) on MCM-41, Ni/MCM-in, and Ni/MCM-out, respectively. (d) N 1s XPS profiles of the spent catalysts and MCM-41 after the reaction. (e) Normalized relative intensities of N, Hα, and NH peaks as measured by optical emission spectrometry (SEI = 24 kJ/L, 35 °C, 1 bar, full scale as shown in Figure S20a) (Errors were obtained from three tests under the same conditions).
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) NH3 synthesis rate vs the external Ni site densities of different supported Ni catalysts on SiO2 and MCM-41 (at 36 kJ/L, 35 °C and 1 bar). (b) Desorbed NH3 concentration and (c) corresponding accumulated amount vs purging time in the plasma alone and plasma-catalyst systems (catalyst amount: ∼0.5 g, mixed N2/H2 as the purge gas). (d) Plasma-driven decomposition of NH3 in the plasma alone and plasma-SiO2/-MCM-41 systems (init. adsorption: initial adsorption stage; re-adsorption: NH3 re-adsorption stage; NH3 dec. rate: NH3 decomposition rate; discharge power = 5 W, with ∼0.1 g catalysts).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Schematic of the proposed mechanism for the plasma-assisted surface reaction and the “shielding protection” effect of mesoporous MCM-41.

References

    1. Chen J. G.; Crooks R. M.; Seefeldt L. C.; Bren K. L.; Bullock R. M.; Darensbourg M. Y.; Holland P. L.; Hoffman B.; Janik M. J.; Jones A. K.; et al. Beyond Fossil Fuel–Driven Nitrogen Transformations. Science 2018, 360, eaar661110.1126/science.aar6611. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vojvodic A.; Medford A. J.; Studt F.; Abild-Pedersen F.; Khan T. S.; Bligaard T.; Nørskov J. K. Exploring the Limits: A Low-Pressure, Low-Temperature Haber-Bosch Process. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2014, 598, 108–112. 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.03.003. - DOI
    1. Guo J.; Chen P. Ammonia History in the Making. Nat. Catal. 2021, 4, 734–735. 10.1038/s41929-021-00676-0. - DOI
    1. Kyriakou V.; Garagounis I.; Vourros A.; Vasileiou E.; Stoukides M. An Electrochemical Haber-Bosch Process. Joule 2020, 4, 142–158. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.10.006. - DOI
    1. Marnellos G.; Stoukides M. Ammonia Synthesis at Atmospheric Pressure. Science 1998, 282, 98–100. 10.1126/science.282.5386.98. - DOI - PubMed