Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 22;22(1):168.
doi: 10.1186/s12906-022-03643-9.

Probiotics and their beneficial effects on alcohol-induced liver injury in a rat model: the role of fecal microbiota

Affiliations

Probiotics and their beneficial effects on alcohol-induced liver injury in a rat model: the role of fecal microbiota

Maneerat Chayanupatkul et al. BMC Complement Med Ther. .

Abstract

Background: Current therapies for alcohol-induced liver injury are of limited efficacy and associated with significant side effects. With the proposed pathophysiology of alcohol-induced liver injury to be related to deranged gut microbiota, we hypothesized that probiotics would have beneficial effects in attenuating alcohol-induced liver injury.

Methods: Twenty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 4 groups: control group, alcohol group, Lactobacillus plantarum group, and mixed-strain probiotics group. After 4 weeks, all rats were sacrificed, and blood samples were analyzed for ALT, lipopolysaccharide level (LPS), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Liver tissues were processed for histopathology, malondialdehyde (MDA) level and immunohistochemistry for toll-like receptors 4 (TLR-4). Stool samples were collected, and 16S rRNA sequencing was used to analyze the fecal microbiota.

Results: Liver histopathology showed the presence of significant hepatocyte ballooning in the alcohol group as compared with the control group, and the treatment with L. plantarum or mixed-strain probiotics alleviated these changes. Significant elevation of serum ALT, LPS, IL-6, and TNF-α, hepatic MDA levels, and hepatic TLR-4 expression were observed in alcohol-fed rats as compared with control rats. The administration of L. plantarum or mixed-strain probiotics restored these changes to the levels of control rats. The relative abundance of fecal bacteria at genus level showed a significant reduction in Allobaculum, Romboutsia, Bifidobacterium, and Akkermansia in the alcohol group as compared with the control group. In probiotics-treated rats, significant increases in Allobaculum and Bifidobacterium were observed, while the relative abundance of Romboutsia and Akkermansia was unchanged compared to the alcohol group. A reduction in alpha diversity was observed in alcohol-treated rats, whereas the improvement was noted after probiotic treatment.

Conclusions: The treatment with Lactobacillus, whether as single-, or mixed-strain probiotics, was beneficial in reducing the severity of alcohol-induced liver injury likely through the increase in beneficial bacteria, and the reduction of inflammatory responses, and oxidative stress.

Keywords: Alcohol-induced liver injury; Microbiota; Probiotics; Rat model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Liver histopathology in all groups. These are images of liver histopathology using H&E straining at 400x magnification (A, Control group; B, alcohol group; C, L. plantarum group; D, Mixed strain group). Black arrows indicate fat deposition inside hepatocytes and red arrows indicate hepatocyte ballooning
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Immunohistochemical study and percent positivity for TLR-4 in each group. A. Images of immunohistochemical study for TLR-4. These are images of immunohistochemical study for TLR-4 at 200x magnification (A, Control group; B, alcohol group; C, L. plantarum group; D, Mixed strain group). Red arrows indicate TLR-4 positive cells. B. Bar graph representing percent positivity of TLR-4 in each group. a = p-value< 0.05, ns = non-significant
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Bar graphs representing liver enzyme, inflammatory marker and hepatic MDA levels in all groups. A. Serum TNF-α levels in all groups. B. Serum IL-6 levels in all groups. C. Hepatic MDA levels in all groups. a = p-value < 0.05, b = p-value < 0.001, ns = non-significant
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Alpha-diversity (A) and Beta-diversity (B) of gut microbiota in all groups

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rehm J, Shield KD. Global burden of alcohol use disorders and alcohol liver disease. Biomedicines. 2019;7(4):99. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines7040099. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assanangkornchai S, Sam-Angsri N, Rerngpongpan S, Lertnakorn A. Patterns of alcohol consumption in the Thai population: results of the National Household Survey of 2007. Alcohol Alcohol. 2010;45(3):278–285. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agq018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mathurin P, Bataller R. Trends in the management and burden of alcoholic liver disease. J Hepatol. 2015;62(1 Suppl):S38–S46. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drinane MC, Shah VH. Alcoholic hepatitis: diagnosis and prognosis. Clin Liver Dis. 2013;2(2):80–83. doi: 10.1002/cld.164. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines Management of alcohol-related liver disease. J Hepatol. 2018;69(1):154–181. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.018. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources