OASIS 2: Mobility differences with specific prosthetic feet across procedure codes
- PMID: 35733615
- PMCID: PMC9208046
- DOI: 10.1177/20556683221101623
OASIS 2: Mobility differences with specific prosthetic feet across procedure codes
Abstract
Introduction: Recently, many prosthetic devices were subjected to reimbursement coding review. Several prosthetic feet that were historically coded with the shock-attenuating function were recoded. The purpose of this analysis was to compare patient-reported functional mobility across a range of prosthetic feet using real-world clinical outcomes data.
Methods: A retrospective, observational review. A univariate generalized linear model was used to assess mobility across foot categories and between different prosthetic feet coded as L5987 or L5981.
Results: The final sample analyzed comprised of 526 individuals and four mutually exclusive categories of feet examined across a total of 10 different prosthetic foot types. The comparison of prosthetic foot categories were significantly different from the control category (i.e. historically L5981).
Conclusions: The current data suggest the development of some prosthetic foot designs using advanced materials and geometric designs can provide comparable functional benefits as those with distinct shock absorbing mechanical features. Emphasizing functional performance over visible features may be a pathway towards higher performance for the end user.
Keywords: amputees; mobility; outcomes; prosthesis foot type; prosthetic feet.
© The Author(s) 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Perry J. Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function. In: Charles B. (ed). Thorofare, NJ: Slack, Inc., 1992.
-
- Winter DA. The Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Gait: Normal, Elderly and Pathological. 2nd ed. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo Press, 1991.
-
- Tagawa Y, Shiba N, Miyazaki K, et al. Bioengineering. Effects of knee and ankle movements on foot impact forces in human walking. JSME Int J Ser C 2001; 44(4): 1089–1096.
-
- Devan H, Hendrick P, Hale L, et al. Exploring factors influencing low back pain in people with nondysvascular lower limb amputation: a national survey. PM&R 2017; 9(10): 949–959. - PubMed
-
- Gard SA, Konz RJ. The effect of a shock-absorbing pylon on the gait of persons with unilateral transtibial amputation. J Rehabil Res Develop 2003; 40(2): 111. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
