Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan-Apr;17(1):19-25.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1547.

Tension-band Plating for Leg-length Discrepancy Correction

Affiliations

Tension-band Plating for Leg-length Discrepancy Correction

Jaap J Tolk et al. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2022 Jan-Apr.

Abstract

Aim: Dual tension-band plates are used for temporary epiphysiodesis and longitudinal guided growth. The study aim was to assess rate of correction, to identify development of femoral and tibial intra-articular deformity during correction and to document resumption of growth after plate removal.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study of 34 consecutive patients treated with dual tension-band plates between 2012 and 2020 was performed. Twenty-four patients had surgery at the distal femur, six at the proximal tibia and four at both. Twenty-five female patients were treated at a mean age of 11.6 (±1.4) years and nine male patients at 13.5 (±1.5) years. Measurements were performed on standardised long-leg radiographs and included leg-length discrepancy (LLD), joint line congruency angle (JLCA), tibial roof angle, femoral floor angle and notch-intercondylar distance. Measurements were taken pre-operatively, at the end of discrepancy correction and at skeletal maturity.

Results: The LLD reduced by a mean of 12.9 mm (95% CI 10.2-15.5) with the mean residual difference 8.4 mm (95% CI 5.4-11.4). The mean correction rate for the proximal tibia was 0.40 (SD 0.33) mm/month and 0.68 (SD 0.36) mm/month for the distal femur. A significant mean change in residual LLD [-2.5 mm (95% CI -4.2 to -0.7)] was observed between plate removal and skeletal maturity at the femoral level only. After length discrepancy correction, the tibial roof angle showed a significant difference of 8.4° (95% CI 13.4-3.4) between legs. In femoral epiphysiodesis patients, no important differences were observed.

Conclusion: A significant reduction in LLD can be achieved using dual tension-band plating. A change in intra-articular morphology was observed only in the proximal tibia and not in the distal femur. In the authors' opinion, tension-band plating is a useful tool for leg-length equalisation but should be reserved for younger patients or when residual growth is difficult to predict. It is one of the management strategies for limb-length difference prior to skeletal maturity.

How to cite this article: Tolk JJ, Merchant R, Calder PR, et al. Tension-band Plating for Leg-length Discrepancy Correction. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(1):19-25.

Keywords: Epiphysiodesis; Guided growth; Leg-length discrepancy; Tension-band plating.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Radiograph of the knee showing the tibia roof angle
Figs 2A and B
Figs 2A and B
(A) Radiograph of the knee showing the notch-intercondylar distance; (B) Radiograph of the knee showing the femoral floor angle
Flowchart 1
Flowchart 1
Flow diagram of included and excluded patients
Figs 3A and B
Figs 3A and B
Example of a patient treated with dual tension-band plating of both the distal femur and the proximal tibia. Pre-operative tibial roof angles were similar between the operated and the non-operated leg, whereas after leg-length correction the tibia roof angle was considerably lower on the operated side compared to the contralateral side. This resembles a ‘volcano’-type deformity

References

    1. Vitale MA, Choe JC, Sesko AM, et al. The effect of limb length discrepancy on health-related quality of life: Is the “2 cm rule” appropriate? J Pediatr Orthop Part B. 2006;15(1):1–5. doi: 10.1097/01202412-200601000-00001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gordon JE, Davis LE. Leg length discrepancy: the natural history (and what do we really know). J Pediatr Orthop. 2019;39:S10–S13. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001396. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eastwood DM, Sanghrajka AP. Guided growth: recent advances in a deep-rooted concept. J Bone Jt Surg Ser B. 2011;93B(1):12–18. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.25181. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaumetou E, Mallet C, Souchet P, et al. Poor efficiency of eight-plates in the treatment of lower limb discrepancy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(7):715–719. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000518. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lauge-Pedersen H, Hägglund G. Eight plate should not be used for treating leg length discrepancy. J Child Orthop. 2013;7(4):285–288. doi: 10.1007/s11832-013-0506-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed