Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 22;3(3):288-294.
doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.02.011. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Deep sedation with propofol in patients undergoing left atrial ablation procedures-Is it safe?

Affiliations

Deep sedation with propofol in patients undergoing left atrial ablation procedures-Is it safe?

Leonie Foerschner et al. Heart Rhythm O2. .

Abstract

Background: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) or left atrial tachycardia is well established. To avoid body movement and pain, sedative and analgesic agents are used.

Objective: The aim was to investigate safety of sedation/anti-pain protocol administered by electrophysiology (EP) staff.

Methods: A total of 3211 consecutive patients (61% male) undergoing left atrial ablation for paroxysmal AF (37.1%), persistent AF (35.3%) or left atrial tachycardia (27.6%) were included. Midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol were administered by EP staff. In case of respiratory depression, endotracheal intubation (eIT) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) was implemented. Risk factors for eIT or NIV were analyzed.

Results: Mean doses of propofol, midazolam, and fentanyl were 33.7 ± 16.7 mg, 3 ± 11.1 mg, and 0.16 ± 2.2 mg, respectively. Norepinephrine was administered in 396 of 3211 patients (12.3%) because of blood pressure drop (mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg). NIV was necessary in 47 patients (1.5%) and eIT in 1 patient (0.03%). Procedure duration, high body mass index (BMI), high CHADS2-VASC2 score, high age, low glomerular filtration rate, diabetes mellitus, and low baseline oxygen saturation were associated with NIV or eIT. The only independent predictor for NIV/eIT was high BMI (>30.1 ± 9.0 kg/m2). Therefore, patients with a BMI of ≥30 had a 40% higher risk for the need of NIV/eIT during the procedure in our study.

Conclusion: Sedation/anti-pain control including midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl administered by EP staff is safe, with only 1.53% requirement of NIV/eIT. High BMI (>30 kg/m2) emerged as an independent predictor for eIT/NIV.

Keywords: Ablation; Atrial fibrillation; Deep sedation; Periprocedural anesthesia; Propofol.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Sacks D., Baxter B., Campbell C.V., et al. Multisociety consensus quality improvement revised consensus statement for endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2018;13:612–632. - PubMed
    1. Knackstedt C., Schauerte P., Kirchhof P. Electro-anatomic mapping systems in arrhythmias. Europace. 2008;10(Suppl 3):iii28–iii34. - PubMed
    1. Li K.H.C., Sang T., Chan C., et al. Anaesthesia use in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Heart Asia. 2019;11 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Santangeli P., Lin D. Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: have we achieved cure with pulmonary vein isolation? Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2015;11:71–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wutzler A., Rolf S., Huemer M., et al. Safety aspects of deep sedation during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012;35:38–43. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources