Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun;72(3):181-191.
doi: 10.1007/s13224-021-01484-z. Epub 2021 Jul 12.

A Systematic Review of Antenatal Risk Scoring Systems in India to Predict Adverse Neonatal Outcomes

Dinesh Raj Pallepogula  1 , Adhisivam Bethou  1 , Vishnu Bhat Ballambatu  2 , Gowri Dorairajan  3 , Ganesh Kumar Saya  4 , Sureshkumar Kamalakannan  5 , Sandhya Karra  6
Affiliations
Review

A Systematic Review of Antenatal Risk Scoring Systems in India to Predict Adverse Neonatal Outcomes

Dinesh Raj Pallepogula et al. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of antenatal care (ANC) is to identify 'at-risk' pregnant women, to provide quality care for all, and maximize the allocation of resources for those who need them the most. To address the synergistic effect of risk factors, clinicians across the globe developed antenatal scoring systems.

Objective: This review aims to investigate various antenatal risk scoring systems developed and used in India to predict adverse neonatal outcome.

Methods: We reviewed articles published between January 2000 and April 2020, which have either developed a scoring system or used a scoring system, among the Indian population. This systematic review is reported based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Prediction model study Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was employed for the assessment of the quality of included studies. Data sources such as Embase, MEDLINE/Pubmed, APA PsycExtra, PsycINFO, CINHAL Plus, Cochrane Library, IndMED, LILACS, Scopus, WHO Reproductive Health Library and Web of science were searched.

Results: An initial search retrieved a total of 6246 articles. This systematic review identified six studies, of which one study developed an antenatal scoring system and the other five studies used two antenatal systems for predicting adverse neonatal outcome. The study which developed a risk scoring system had a high risk of bias (ROB) and concern for applicability. The overall sensitivity of the antenatal scoring system was high (77.4%), but the specificity was low (45%). Similarly, the positive predictive value is low (15.3%), and the negative predictive value is high (94.2%). A meta-analysis was not conducted due to the heterogeneity of the studies and insufficient data.

Conclusions: There is a need for a systematically developed antenatal scoring system for India. Such scoring systems can be promising in public health, proposing a paradigm shift in the implementation of effective mother and child health programmes locally as well as nationally.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13224-021-01484-z.

Keywords: Antenatal risk scoring; High-risk pregnancy; India; Risk score development; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lilford RJ, Chard T. Problems and pitfalls of risk assessment in antenatal care. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983;90(6):507–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08956.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chard T, Harding S, Carroll S, Hudson CN, Lloyd DSL, Sloan D. A comparison of different methods for calculating overall risk scores from risk factors ascertained in a computerized obstetric information system. J Perinat Med. 1990;18(1):23–29. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1990.18.1.23. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kumar MP, Gnanadeep TNV, Dixit UR, Patil PS. Prevalence of high risk pregnancy In rural Dharwad. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14(10):2279–2861.
    1. Majella MG, Sarveswaran G, Krishnamoorthy Y, Sivaranjini K, Arikrishnan K, Kumar SG. A longitudinal study on high risk pregnancy and its outcome among antenatal women attending rural primary health centre in Puducherry. South India. J Educ Health Promot. 2019;8:12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burstyn I. Antepartum Risk Score Predicts Adverse Birth Outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada [Internet]. 2010;32(1):16–20. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34398-5. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources