Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2022 May 20:78:103837.
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103837. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Facial defects reconstruction by titanium mesh bending using 3D printing technology: A report of two cases

Affiliations
Case Reports

Facial defects reconstruction by titanium mesh bending using 3D printing technology: A report of two cases

Wafik Mayo et al. Ann Med Surg (Lond). .

Abstract

Introduction: Facial injuries and deformities have received special attention during the previous decades for their functional, esthetic impairment, surgical challenges related to the location of the intervention, and their relationship to a lower survival rate. Moreover, there have been many surgical reconstructive methods due to the different materials and tools available and thus the final results following the surgical intervention.

Case presentation: This study was conducted on two patients with severe war injuries; they both suffered from a significant loss in one or more of the following bones: the zygomatic bone, maxilla, nasal bone, infraorbital rim, and mandible. They were treated using preshaped 3D titanium mesh implants that were made using polylactic acid (PLA) material. The final shape was identified depending on pregenerated multislice 3D modeling using computed tomography (CT) scan.

Clinical discussion and conclusion: The patient-specific titanium implants produced using polylactic acid (PLA) have been an important option for reconstructive surgical interventions in facial injuries. It has achieved a better outcome in comparison with manual bent titanium mesh in terms of anatomical symmetry, overall operating time, functional and esthetic impairment. These points helped achieve better care for both civilian and war injuries associated with bone loss.

Keywords: Case report; Facial defect; Polylactic acid; Titanium mesh; War injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. (1)
Fig. (1)
3D reconstruction based on CT scan slices in the first case.
Fig. (2)
Fig. (2)
Molding titanium mesh according to 3D printed template in the first case.
Fig. (3)
Fig. (3)
Postoperative aspect showing the reconstructed area in the first case.

References

    1. Piombino P., Spinzia A., Abbate V., Bonavolontà P., Orabona G.D.A., Califano L. Reconstruction of small orbital floor fractures with resorbable collagen membranes. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2013;24:571–574. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0B013E31827C7F77. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kolk A., Pautke C., Schott V., Ventrella E., Wiener E., Ploder O., et al. Secondary post-traumatic enophthalmos: high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging compared with multislice computed tomography in postoperative orbital volume measurement. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2007;65:1926–1934. doi: 10.1016/J.JOMS.2006.06.269. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maravelakis E., David K., Antoniadis A., Manios A., Bilalis N., Papaharilaou Y. Reverse engineering techniques for cranioplasty: a case study. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2008;32:115–121. doi: 10.1080/03091900600700749. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sugar A.W., Kurlakose M., Walshaw N.D. Titanium mesh in orbital wall reconstruction. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1992;21:140–144. doi: 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80780-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agha R.A., Franchi T., Sohrabi C., Mathew G., for the SCARE Group The SCARE 2020 guideline: updating consensus surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines. Int. J. Surg. 2020;84:226–230. - PubMed

Publication types