Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 19;9(6):260.
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9060260.

Effectiveness of the REvision System and Sonic Irrigation in the Removal of Root Canal Filling Material from Oval Canals: An In Vitro Study

Affiliations

Effectiveness of the REvision System and Sonic Irrigation in the Removal of Root Canal Filling Material from Oval Canals: An In Vitro Study

Marc Krikor Kaloustian et al. Bioengineering (Basel). .

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Endostar REvision system (Poldent, Warsaw, Poland) in the removal of filling materials from oval root canals using sonic irrigation as an additional cleaning method. Thirty human-extracted mandibular premolars with oval canals were prepared using the ProTaper Universal system (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) up to instrument F1 (20/.07), and then filled by the continuous wave vertical compaction technique using pulp canal sealer EWT (Sybron Dental Specialties, Orange, CA, USA). The teeth were randomly divided into two groups (n = 15) according to the instrumentation system and the additional cleaning method, as follows: REvision (30/.08, 25/.06) with EQ-S sonic activation (Meta Biomed, Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea), REvision (30/.08, 25/.06) without additional activation. All specimens were sectioned longitudinally at 3 and 7 mm from the apex, and analyzed using digital microscopy (KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan) to measure the total area of the residual obturation materials, followed by SEM analysis. The data on the percentage of remaining filling material were analyzed by Kruskal−Wallis one-way Analysis of Variance on ranks. None of the retreatment protocols completely removed the filling material from the root canals (p > 0.05); the retreatment technique using sonic activation showed statistically less residual filling materials than the retreatment technique using irrigants without activation at the coronal third (p < 0.05), whilst no significant difference was found between both tested groups at the apical and middle thirds (p > 0.05). The REvision system showed promising results in the removal of filling materials from oval canals.

Keywords: filling materials removal; oval-shaped canal; retreatment procedure; revision system; sonic activation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scanning electron microscopy images demonstrating the Endostar REvision instrument (30/08 and 25/06).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Methodology of residual materials area measurements using VHX-5000 software.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scanning electron microscope micrographs showing the different observed colors and structures of the root canal and residual materials, which were detected under a digital microscope. (a) Digital microscope image; (b) residual materials (gutta-percha/sealer); (c) dentinal wall with open tubules; (d) residual materials–dentin interface; (e) dentinal walls with closed tubules.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Digital microscope images demonstrate the effectiveness of the retreatment technique with irrigant activation (ac) and without irrigant activation (df) in the apical, middle, and coronal thirds of the root canal.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Crozeta B.M., Silva-Sousa Y.T.C., Leoni G.B., Mazzi-Chaves J.F., Fantinato T., Baratto-Filho F., Sousa-Neto M.D. Micro–Computed Tomography Study of Filling Material Removal from Oval-shaped Canals by Using Rotary, Reciprocating, and Adaptive Motion Systems. J. Endod. 2016;42:793–797. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.02.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lin S., Sabbah W., Sedgley C.M., Whitten B. A survey for endodontists in today’s economy: Exploring the current state of endodontics as a profession and the relationship between endodontists and their referral base. J. Endod. 2015;41:325–332. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crozeta B.M., Chaves de Souza L., Correa Silva-Sousa Y.T., Sousa-Neto M.D., Jaramillo D.E., Silva R.M. Evaluation of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and GentleWave System as Adjuvants in Endodontic Retreatment. J. Endod. 2020;46:1279–1285. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kfir A., Tsesis I., Yakirevich E., Matalon S., Abramovitz I. The efficacy of five techniques for removing root filling material: Microscopic versus radiographic evaluation. Int. Endod. J. 2012;45:35–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01944.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jiang S., Zou T., Li D., Chang J.W.W., Huang X., Zhang C. Effectiveness of Sonic, Ultrasonic, and Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming Activation of NaOCl on Filling Material Removal Following Retreatment in Oval Canal Anatomy. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2016;34:3–10. doi: 10.1089/pho.2015.3937. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources