Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;55(8):1054-1065.
doi: 10.1002/eat.23762. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

Attachment insecurity predicts worse outcome in patients with eating disorders treated with enhanced cognitive behavior therapy: A one-year follow-up study

Affiliations

Attachment insecurity predicts worse outcome in patients with eating disorders treated with enhanced cognitive behavior therapy: A one-year follow-up study

Eleonora Rossi et al. Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the role of attachment insecurity in predicting a worse longitudinal trend of eating disorder (ED) psychopathology and body uneasiness in patients with Anorexia Nervosa (AN) or Bulimia Nervosa (BN) treated with Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy, considering the longitudinal interplay between these dimensions.

Method: In total, 185 patients with AN or BN performed the baseline assessment, and 123 were re-evaluated after 1 year of treatment. Participants completed questionnaires evaluating ED psychopathology (Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire) and body uneasiness (body uneasiness test). For the assessment of adult attachment, the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised was administered at baseline. Bivariate latent change score analysis within the structural equation modeling framework was performed to investigate the evolution of ED psychopathology and body uneasiness, their longitudinal interplay, and the role of attachment style as an outcome predictor.

Results: After treatment, all psychopathological features showed an overall improvement. Higher baseline levels of body uneasiness predicted a worse course of ED psychopathology. The change in body uneasiness over time depended on changes over time in ED psychopathology, but not vice versa. Insecure attachment predicted a worse longitudinal trend of ED psychopathology, and, through this impairment, it indirectly maintained higher levels of body uneasiness, as confirmed by mediation analyses.

Discussion: The role of attachment insecurity as a predictor of treatment outcome suggests the need for an integration of the cognitive-behavioral conceptualization of EDs with a developmental perspective that considers attachment-related issues.

Public significance statement: Considering the burden of EDs in terms of public health and the unsatisfactory response to standard treatments, the identification of outcome predictors is of considerable clinical interest. This study demonstrated that attachment insecurity was associated with worse longitudinal trends of ED psychopathology and body uneasiness in patients with AN and BN treated with CBT-E, highlighting the importance of personalizing treatment programs taking into account a developmental perspective on these disorders.

Keywords: attachment style; bivariate latent change score; body uneasiness; cognitive-behavior therapy; eating disorders; longitudinal structural equation modeling; treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Final bivariate latent change score (LCS) model of the complex associations between insecure attachment, eating disorder psychopathology (in blue) and body uneasiness (in red). Observed variables are represented by rectangles, whereas circles represent latent variables. Single‐headed arrows connecting variables represent regression effects, with their respective unstandardized and standardized (in parenthesis) coefficients reported as labels. Intercepts are reported as triangles with their respective arrows. Effects or variances that were constrained to zero are illustrated as gray arrows, whereas those constrained to one are shown using arrows labeled as “1.” Double‐headed arrows represent variances. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001. BUT‐A, Body Uneasiness Test‐A; ECR‐R, Experiences in Close Relationships–Revised; EDE‐Q, Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire; GSI, Global Severity Index

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association . (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Fifth ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
    1. Atwood, M. E. , & Friedman, A. (2020). A systematic review of enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT‐E) for eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 53, 311–330. 10.1002/eat.23206 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bachner‐Melman, R. , Zohar, A. H. , & Ebstein, R. P. (2006). An examination of cognitive versus behavioral components of recovery from anorexia nervosa. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194, 697–703. - PubMed
    1. Balbo, M. , Zaccagnino, M. , Cussino, M. , & Civiiotti, C. (2017). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and eating disorders: A systematic review. Clinical Neuropsychiatry: Journal of Treatment Evaluation, 14, 321–329.
    1. Bardone, A. M. , Vohs, K. D. , Abramson, L. Y. , Heatherton, T. , & Joiner, T. E. (2000). The confluence of perfectionism, body dissatisfaction, and low self‐esteem predicts bulimic symptoms: Clinical implications. Elsevier, 31, 265–280.

Publication types