Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 31;12(6):572.
doi: 10.3390/membranes12060572.

Evaluation of Different Capture Solutions for Ammonia Recovery in Suspended Gas Permeable Membrane Systems

María Soto-Herranz  1 , Mercedes Sánchez-Báscones  1 , Juan Manuel Antolín-Rodríguez  1 , Pablo Martín-Ramos  2
Affiliations

Evaluation of Different Capture Solutions for Ammonia Recovery in Suspended Gas Permeable Membrane Systems

María Soto-Herranz et al. Membranes (Basel). .

Abstract

Gas permeable membranes (GPM) are a promising technology for the capture and recovery of ammonia (NH3). The work presented herein assessed the impact of the capture solution and temperature on NH3 recovery for suspended GPM systems, evaluating at a laboratory scale the performance of eight different trapping solutions (water and sulfuric, phosphoric, nitric, carbonic, carbonic, acetic, citric, and maleic acids) at 25 and 2 °C. At 25 °C, the highest NH3 capture efficiency was achieved using strong acids (87% and 77% for sulfuric and nitric acid, respectively), followed by citric and phosphoric acid (65%) and water (62%). However, a remarkable improvement was observed for phosphoric acid (+15%), citric acid (+16%), maleic acid (+22%), and water (+12%) when the capture solution was at 2 °C. The economic analysis showed that water would be the cheapest option at any working temperature, with costs of 2.13 and 2.52 €/g N (vs. 3.33 and 3.43 €/g N for sulfuric acid) in the winter and summer scenarios, respectively. As for phosphoric and citric acid, they could be promising NH3 trapping solutions in the winter months, with associated costs of 3.20 and 3.96 €/g N, respectively. Based on capture performance and economic and environmental considerations, the reported findings support that water, phosphoric acid, and citric acid can be viable alternatives to the strong acids commonly used as NH3 adsorbents in these systems.

Keywords: ammonia adsorbents; ammonia recovery; citric acid; organic acids; phosphoric acid; water.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Evolution of the amount of TAN captured in the different trapping solutions during the 7-day experiments at (a) 25 °C and (b) 2 °C. All values are expressed as mean ± s.d. of n = 3.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mass of NH3-N recovered by the different trapping solutions at two temperatures after 7 days. Values with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test. All values are expressed as means of n = 3.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Economic analysis of the suspended GPM-based NH3 capture process using eight different types of trapping solutions in the (a) summer (25 °C) and (b) winter (2 °C) scenarios.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Vanotti M.B., García-González M.C., Szögi A.A., Harrison J.H., Smith W.B., Moral R. Removing and Recovering Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Animal Manure. Anim. Manure Prod. Charact. Environ. Concerns Manag. 2020;67:275–321. doi: 10.2134/asaspecpub67.c22. - DOI
    1. Bouwman L., Goldewijk K.K., Van Der Hoek K.W., Beusen A.H.W., Van Vuuren D.P., Willems J., Rufino M.C., Stehfest E. Erratum: Exploring global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by livestock production over the 1900–2050 period. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:21196. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012878108. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leip A., Billen G., Garnier J., Grizzetti B., Lassaletta L., Reis S., Simpson D., Sutton M.A., De Vries W., Weiss F., et al. Impacts of European livestock production: Nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorus and greenhouse gas emissions, land-use, water eutrophication and biodiversity. Environ. Res. Lett. 2015;10:115004. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/115004. - DOI
    1. Vanotti M., Szogi A., Pilar Bernal M., Martinez J. Livestock waste treatment systems of the future: A challenge to environmental quality, food safety, and sustainability. OECD Workshop. Bioresour. Technol. 2009;100:5371–5373. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vanotti M.B., Dube P.J., Szogi A.A., García-González M.C. Recovery of ammonia and phosphate minerals from swine wastewater using gas-permeable membranes. Water Res. 2017;112:137–146. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.045. - DOI - PubMed