Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 13;11(12):1558.
doi: 10.3390/plants11121558.

Morpho-Agronomic Evaluation of Lagenaria siceraria Landraces and Their F1 Populations

Affiliations

Morpho-Agronomic Evaluation of Lagenaria siceraria Landraces and Their F1 Populations

Lungani Siyabonga Nkosi et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Lagenaria siceraria is one of the most important cucurbitaceous vegetables due to its prolific bearing habit, its edibility as a cooked vegetable, and its low cost of cultivation. The objective of this study was to evaluate variation in the morpho-agronomic traits among selected landraces and their F1 populations. The landraces were crossed based on the North Carolina II genetic design to develop F1 populations. The twelve F1 populations along with seven parental landraces were grown in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed among quantitative traits suggesting considerable genetic variability. The genotypes displayed significant variation in most qualitative traits of fruits and seeds. The first five principal components of quantitative traits among the evaluated 19 genotypes contributed 74.84% of the variability. The biplot and dendrogram clustered the genotypes into five clusters according to their vegetative, fruit, and seed traits. The highest value for the broad-sense heritability estimate was recorded for days to edible harvest maturity trait. The F1 progenies were more variable than the landraces and can therefore be used for further Lagenaria siceraria genetic improvement.

Keywords: F1; fruit; genetic variability; genotypes; leaf; qualitative; quantitative traits; shape; yield.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diversity in leaf color and leaf margin among Lagenaria siceraria genotypes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diversity in fruit color, fruit shape, and fruit texture among Lagenaria siceraria genotypes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diversity in seed color and seed shape among Lagenaria siceraria genotypes.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Biplot of Lagenaria siceraria genotypes and agronomic traits. Genotypes and agronomic traits (variables) are described in Table 2 and Table 3 and Table 4, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Hierarchical cluster showing similarities amongst Lagenaria siceraria genotypes using the complete linkage method. The description of genotypes appears in Table 2.

References

    1. Doloi N., Patel J.N., Acharya R.R. Heterosis Studies in Bottle Gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol) Standl.] Vegetos. 2018;31:253–256.
    1. Mladenović E., Berenji J., Ognjanov V., Ljubojević M., Cukanović J. Genetic variability of bottle gourd Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) standley and its morphological characterization by multivariate analysis. Arch. Biol. Sci. Belgrade. 2012;64:573–583. doi: 10.2298/ABS1202573M. - DOI
    1. Yetisir H., Sakar M., Serce S. Collection and morphological characterization of Lagenaria siceraria germplasm from the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2008;55:1257–1266. doi: 10.1007/s10722-008-9325-y. - DOI
    1. Jesus O.N., de Freitas J.P.X., Dantas J.L.L., de Oliveira E.J. Use of morpho-agronomic traits and DNA profiling for classification of genetic diversity in papaya. Genet. Mol. Res. 2013;12:6646–6663. doi: 10.4238/2013.July.11.8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keneni G., Jarso M., Wolabu T., Dino G. Extent and pattern of genetic diversity for morpho-agronomic traits in Ethiopian highland pulse landraces II. Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2005;52:551–561. doi: 10.1007/s10722-003-6022-8. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources