Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 1;28(17):3742-3751.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-0203.

Classification of BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Using an ACMG/AMP Model Incorporating a Homology-Directed Repair (HDR) Functional Assay

Affiliations

Classification of BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Using an ACMG/AMP Model Incorporating a Homology-Directed Repair (HDR) Functional Assay

Chunling Hu et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: The identification of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes by hereditary cancer testing poses great challenges for the clinical management of variant carriers. The ACMG/AMP (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology) variant classification framework, which incorporates multiple sources of evidence, has the potential to establish the clinical relevance of many VUS. We sought to classify the clinical relevance of 133 single-nucleotide substitution variants encoding missense variants in the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of BRCA2 by incorporating results from a validated functional assay into an ACMG/AMP-variant classification model from a hereditary cancer-testing laboratory.

Experimental design: The 133 selected VUS were evaluated using a validated homology-directed double-strand DNA break repair (HDR) functional assay. Results were combined with clinical and genetic data from variant carriers in a rules-based variant classification model for BRCA2.

Results: Of 133 missense variants, 44 were designated as non-functional and 89 were designated as functional in the HDR assay. When combined with genetic and clinical information from a single diagnostic laboratory in an ACMG/AMP-variant classification framework, 66 variants previously classified by the diagnostic laboratory were correctly classified, and 62 of 67 VUS (92.5%) were reclassified as likely pathogenic (n = 22) or likely benign (n = 40). In total, 44 variants were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic, 84 as benign/likely benign, and 5 remained as VUS.

Conclusions: Incorporation of HDR functional analysis into an ACMG/AMP framework model substantially improves BRCA2 VUS re-classification and provides an important tool for determining the clinical relevance of individual BRCA2 VUS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1. Homology-directed repair (HDR) assay evaluation of clinically observed BRCA2 DNA-binding domain (DBD) missense variants. HDR scores with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are presented on a 1 to 5 scale based on HDR activity of wild-type BRCA2 (HDR score = 5) and the p.Asp2723His non-functional pathogenic variant (HDR score = 1). HDR thresholds for functional (>2.50) and non-functional (<1.49) are indicated by horizontal dotted lines. Variants are ordered on the basis of amino acid position (x-axis).
Figure 1.
Homology-directed repair (HDR) assay evaluation of clinically observed BRCA2 DNA-binding domain (DBD) missense variants. HDR scores with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are presented on a 1 to 5 scale based on HDR activity of wild-type BRCA2 (HDR score = 5) and the p.Asp2723His non-functional pathogenic variant (HDR score = 1). HDR thresholds for functional (>2.50) and non-functional (<1.49) are indicated by horizontal dotted lines. Variants are ordered on the basis of amino acid position (x-axis).
Figure 2. Incorporation of HDR functional data into a clinical ACMG/AMP framework for variant classification. BRCA2 DBD missense variants observed clinically by GeneDx were classified by an ACMG/AMP-like framework into five categories: PATH (pathogenic), LPATH (likely pathogenic), VUS (variants of uncertain significance), LBEN (likely benign), BEN (benign). The PATH and LPATH categories were combined, LBEN and BEN categories were combined. The number of variants in each classification category defined by ClinVar (ClinGen approved laboratories excluding GeneDx) and by GeneDx before and after applying HDR functional data are shown.
Figure 2.
Incorporation of HDR functional data into a clinical ACMG/AMP framework for variant classification. BRCA2 DBD missense variants observed clinically by GeneDx were classified by an ACMG/AMP-like framework into five categories: PATH (pathogenic), LPATH (likely pathogenic), VUS (variants of uncertain significance), LBEN (likely benign), BEN (benign). The PATH and LPATH categories were combined, LBEN and BEN categories were combined. The number of variants in each classification category defined by ClinVar (ClinGen approved laboratories excluding GeneDx) and by GeneDx before and after applying HDR functional data are shown.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Gene-based calibration of high-throughput functional assays for clinical variant classification.
    Zeiberg D, Tejura M, McEwen AE, Fayer S, Pejaver V, Rubin AF, Starita LM, Fowler DM, O'Donnell-Luria A, Radivojac P. Zeiberg D, et al. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 May 4:2025.04.29.651326. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.29.651326. bioRxiv. 2025. PMID: 40654914 Free PMC article. Preprint.
  • Co-observation of germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes: Results from analysis of the BRIDGES sequencing dataset.
    Davidson AL, Michailidou K, Parsons MT, Fortuno C, Bolla MK, Wang Q, Dennis J, Naven M, Abubakar M, Ahearn TU, Alonso MR, Andrulis IL, Antoniou AC, Auvinen P, Behrens S, Bermisheva MA, Bogdanova NV, Bojesen SE, Brüning T, Byers HJ, Camp NJ, Campbell A, Castelao JE, Cessna MH, Chang-Claude J, Chanock SJ, Chenevix-Trench G; NBCS Collaborators; Collée JM, Czene K, Dörk T, Eriksson M, Evans DG, Fasching PA, Figueroa JD, Flyger H, Gago-Dominguez M, García-Closas M, Glendon G, González-Neira A, Grassmann F, Gronwald J, Guénel P, Hadjisavvas A, Haeberle L, Hall P, Hamann U, Hartman M, Ho PJ, Hooning MJ, Hoppe R, Howell A; kConFab Investigators; Jakubowska A, Khusnutdinova EK, Kristensen VN, Li J, Lim J, Lindblom A, Liu J, Lophatananon A, Mannermaa A, Mavroudis DA, Mensenkamp AR, Milne RL, Muir KR, Newman WG, Obi N, Panayiotidis MI, Park SK, Park-Simon TW, Peterlongo P, Radice P, Rashid MU, Rhenius V, Saloustros E, Sawyer EJ, Schmidt MK, Seibold P, Shah M, Southey MC, Teo SH, Tomlinson I, Torres D, Truong T, van de Beek I, van der Hout AH, Wendt CC, Dunning AM, Pharoah PDP, Devilee P, Easton DF, James PA, Spurdle AB. Davidson AL, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Sep 5;111(9):2059-2069. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Aug 2. Am J Hum Genet. 2024. PMID: 39096911 Free PMC article.
  • DNA binding and RAD51 engagement by the BRCA2 C-terminus orchestrate DNA repair and replication fork preservation.
    Kwon Y, Rösner H, Zhao W, Selemenakis P, He Z, Kawale AS, Katz JN, Rogers CM, Neal FE, Badamchi Shabestari A, Petrosius V, Singh AK, Joel MZ, Lu L, Holloway SP, Burma S, Mukherjee B, Hromas R, Mazin A, Wiese C, Sørensen CS, Sung P. Kwon Y, et al. Nat Commun. 2023 Jan 26;14(1):432. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36211-x. Nat Commun. 2023. PMID: 36702902 Free PMC article.
  • GnomAD Missense Variants of Uncertain Significance: Implications for p53 Stability and Phosphorylation.
    García-Ayala FD, Ayala-Madrigal ML, Peregrina-Sandoval J, Moreno-Ortiz JM, González-Mercado A, Gutiérrez-Angulo M. García-Ayala FD, et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Aug 1;26(15):7455. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157455. Int J Mol Sci. 2025. PMID: 40806592 Free PMC article.
  • Functional analysis and clinical classification of 462 germline BRCA2 missense variants affecting the DNA binding domain.
    Hu C, Huang H, Na J, Lumby C, Abozaid M, Holdren MA, Rao TJ, Karam R, Pesaran T, Weyandt JD, Csuy CM, Seelaus CA, Young CC, Fulk K, Heidari Z, Morais Lyra PC Jr, Couch RE, Persons B, Polley EC, Gnanaolivu RD, Boddicker NJ, Monteiro ANA, Yadav S, Domchek SM, Richardson ME, Couch FJ. Hu C, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Mar 7;111(3):584-593. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.02.002. Epub 2024 Feb 27. Am J Hum Genet. 2024. PMID: 38417439 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. . Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the american college of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular pathology. Genet Med 2015;17:405–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hu C, Hart SN, Gnanaolivu R, Huang H, Lee KY, Na J, et al. . A population-based study of genes previously implicated in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2021;384:440–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. LaDuca H, Polley EC, Yussuf A, Hoang L, Gutierrez S, Hart SN, et al. . A clinical guide to hereditary cancer panel testing: evaluation of gene-specific cancer associations and sensitivity of genetic testing criteria in a cohort of 165,000 high-risk patients. Genet Med 2020;22:407–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guidugli L, Shimelis H, Masica DL, Pankratz VS, Lipton GB, Singh N, et al. . Assessment of the clinical relevance of BRCA2 missense variants by functional and computational approaches. Am J Hum Genet 2018;102:233–48. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parsons MT, Tudini E, Li H, Hahnen E, Wappenschmidt B, Feliubadalo L, et al. . Large scale multifactorial likelihood quantitative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants: an ENIGMA resource to support clinical variant classification. Hum Mutat 2019;40:1557–78. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types