Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jun;8(6):754-762.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.02.018. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

Reduction in Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Burden in Patients Enrolled in the RAID Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Reduction in Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Burden in Patients Enrolled in the RAID Trial

Arwa Younis et al. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The RAID (Ranolazine Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator) randomized placebo-controlled trial showed that ranolazine treatment was associated with reduction in recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) requiring appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy.

Objectives: This study aimed to identify groups of patients in whom ranolazine treatment would result in the highest reduction of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) burden.

Methods: Andersen-Gill analyses were performed to identify variables associated with risk for VTA burden among 1,012 patients enrolled in RAID. The primary endpoint was VTA burden defined as VTA episodes requiring appropriate treatment.

Results: Multivariate analysis identified 7 factors associated with increased VTA burden: history of VTA, age ≥65 years, New York Heart Association functional class ≥III, QRS complex (≥130 ms), low ejection fraction (<30%), atrial fibrillation (AF), and concomitant antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy. The effect of ranolazine on VTA burden was seen among patients without concomitant AAD therapy (HR [HR]: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.55-0.84; P < 0.001), whereas no effect was seen among those who are concomitantly treated with other AADs (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.90-1.96; P = 0.16); P = 0.003 for interaction. In patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) ICDs, ranolazine treatment was associated with a 36% risk reduction for VTA recurrence (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.47-0.86; P < 0.001), whereas among patients with ICDs without CRT no significant effect was noted (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.74-1.18; P = 0.57); P = 0.047 for interaction.

Conclusions: In patients with high risk for VTA, ranolazine is effective in reducing VTA burden, with significantly greater effect in CRT-treated patients, those without AF, and those not treated with concomitant AADs. In patients already on AADs or those with AF, the addition of ranolazine did not affect VTA burden. (Ranolazine Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Trial [RAID]; NCT01215253).

Keywords: ICD; arrhythmia; cardioverter-defibrillator; ranolazine; ventricular tachycardia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: Clinical Coordination Center (UO1 HL096607) and Data Coordination Center (UO1 HL096610. Study drug and additional financial support for drug distribution was provided by Gilead Sciences grant number IN-US-259-0125. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1 –
Figure 1 –
Hazard ratios and their 95% confidence interval for ventricular tachy-arrhythmic (VTA) event burden in pre-specified subgroups in the intention to treat population
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Mean cumulative events per patient for ventricular tachyarrhythmia stratified by cardiac device.
Panel A shows Ghosh–Lin curves for the total ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes among implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients, Panel B Ghosh–Lin curves for the total ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes among patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy device.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Mean cumulative events per patient for ventricular tachyarrhythmia stratified by concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs.
Panel A shows Ghosh–Lin curves for the total ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes among patients on antiarrhythmic drugs, Panel B Ghosh–Lin curves for the total ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes among patients without antiarrhythmic drugs.

Comment in

References

    1. Schron EB, Exner DV, Yao Q, Jenkins LS, Steinberg JS, Cook JR, Kutalek SP, Friedman PL, Bubien RS, Page RL and Powell J. Quality of life in the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators trial: Impact of therapy and influence of adverse symptoms and defibrillator shocks. Circulation. 2002;105:589–594. - PubMed
    1. Godemann F, Butter C, Lampe F, Linden M, Werner S and Behrens S. Determinants of the quality of life (QoL) in patients with an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD). Quality of Life Research. 2004;13:411–416. - PubMed
    1. Larsen GK, Evans J, Lambert WE, Chen Y and Raitt MH. Shocks burden and increased mortality in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1881–6. - PubMed
    1. MacIntyre CJ, Sapp JL, Abdelwahab A, Al-Harbi M, Doucette S, Gray C, Gardner MJ and Parkash R. The Effect of Shock Burden on Heart Failure and Mortality. CJC Open. 2019;1:161–167. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thireau J, Pasquié J-L, Martel E, Le Guennec J-Y and Richard S. New drugs vs. old concepts: A fresh look at antiarrhythmics. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2011;132:125–145. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data