Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 15;14(12):2946.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14122946.

Pulsed-Reduced Dose Rate (PRDR) Radiotherapy for Recurrent Primary Central Nervous System Malignancies: Dosimetric and Clinical Results

Affiliations

Pulsed-Reduced Dose Rate (PRDR) Radiotherapy for Recurrent Primary Central Nervous System Malignancies: Dosimetric and Clinical Results

Tugce Kutuk et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Purpose: The objective was to describe PRDR outcomes and report EQD2 OAR toxicity thresholds.

Methods: Eighteen patients with recurrent primary CNS tumors treated with PRDR at a single institution between April 2017 and September 2021 were evaluated. The radiotherapy details, cumulative OAR doses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities were collected.

Results: The median PRDR dose was 45 Gy (range: 36-59.4 Gy); the median cumulative EQD2 prescription dose was 102.7 Gy (range: 93.8-120.4 Gy). The median cumulative EQD2 D0.03cc for the brain was 111.4 Gy (range: 82.4-175.2 Gy). Symptomatic radiation necrosis occurred in three patients, for which the median EQD2 brain D0.03cc was 115.9 Gy (110.4-156.7 Gy). The median PFS and OS after PRDR were 6.3 months (95%CI: 0.9-11.6 months) and 8.6 months (95%CI: 4.9-12.3 months), respectively. The systematic review identified five peer-reviewed studies with a median cumulative EQD2 prescription dose of 110.3 Gy. At a median follow-up of 8.7 months, the median PFS and OS were 5.7 months (95%CI: 2.1-15.4 months) and 6.7 months (95%CI: 3.2-14.2 months), respectively.

Conclusion: PRDR re-irradiation is a relatively safe and feasible treatment for recurrent primary CNS tumors. Despite high cumulative dose to OARs, the risk of high-grade, treatment-related toxicity within the first year of follow-up remains acceptable.

Keywords: CNS malignancies; PRDR; glioma; pulsed reduced dose rate radiotherapy; re-irradiation; recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.D.H.: Proton Collaborative Group Executive Committee Institutional Representative and Voting Member, Miami Cancer Institute (unpaid). Grant Funding: Live Like Bella Pediatric Cancer Research Initiative, Florida Department of Health Grants 8LA04 and 22L01, M.C.T.: Honoraria from ViewRay. Institutional research funding from Blue Earth Diagnostics Ltd. Personal fees from Elsevier. H.A.: Honoraria from Novocure Inc. A.N.G.: Honoraria from ViewRay, Inc., Elekta AB, IBA Y.O.: Trial support (BMS, Novocure), DSMC (GammaTile, Actuate, Oncoceutics/Chimerix), Advisory Board (Novocure, Abbvie), and Consulting (Abbvie). M.S.A.: Receipt of grants/research supports: Astrazeneca, Abbvie, BMS, Bayer, Incyte, Pharmacyclics, Novocure, Merck. Stock shareholder: Doctible, Mimivax. Receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Elsevier, Wiley, Abvvie, VBI Vaccines, Bayer, karyopharm, Tocagen, Forma therapeutics M.P.M.: Consulting Fees from Karyopharm, Sapience, Zap, Mevion, Xoft; BOD Oncoceutics; Stock in Chimerix. R.K.: Honoraria from Accuray Inc., Elekta AB, ViewRay Inc., Novocure Inc., Elsevier Inc., and Brainlab and institutional research funding from Medtronic Inc., Blue Earth Diagnostics Ltd., Novocure Inc., GT Medical Technologies, AstraZeneca, Exelixis, ViewRay Inc., and Brainlab.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Institutional workflow demonstrating the calculation of EQD2 dose summation using prior dose and PRDR dose distributions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic diagram illustrating the delivery of a PRDR treatment fraction using fixed-field IMRT technique. The diagram depicts the temporal sequence of individual field delivery during the treatment fraction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nabors L.B., Portnow J., Ahluwalia M., Baehring J., Brem H., Brem S., Butowski N., Campian J.L., Clark S.W., Fabiano A.J., et al. Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2020;18:1537–1570. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0052. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stupp R., Hegi M.E., Mason W.P., van den Bent M.J., Taphoorn M.J., Janzer R.C., Ludwin S.K., Allgeier A., Fisher B., Belanger K., et al. Effects of radiotherapy with con-comitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:459–466. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cairncross G., Wang M., Shaw E., Jenkins R., Brachman D., Buckner J., Fink K., Souhami L., Laperriere N., Curran W., et al. Phase III Trial of Chemoradiotherapy for Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma: Long-Term Results of RTOG 9402. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:337–343. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.2674. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buckner J.C., Shaw E.G., Pugh S.L., Chakravarti A., Gilbert M.R., Barger G.R., Coons S., Ricci P., Bullard D., Brown P.D., et al. Radiation plus Procarbazine, CCNU, and Vin-cristine in Low-Grade Glioma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:1344–1355. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500925. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wallner K.E., Galicich J.H., Krol G., Arbit E., Malkin M.G. Patterns of failure following treatment for glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 1989;16:1405–1409. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90941-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources