Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 4;12(6):738.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci12060738.

The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Error Rates in the Distractor-Induced Deafness Paradigm

Affiliations

The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Error Rates in the Distractor-Induced Deafness Paradigm

Lars Michael et al. Brain Sci. .

Abstract

To further understand how consciousness emerges, certain paradigms inducing distractor-induced perceptual impairments are promising. Neuro-computational models explain the inhibition of conscious perception of targets with suppression of distractor information when the target and distractor share the same features. Because these gating mechanisms are controlled by the prefrontal cortex, transcranial direct current stimulation of this specific region is expected to alter distractor-induced effects depending on the presence and number of distractors. To this end, participants were asked to perform an auditory variant of the distractor-induced blindness paradigm under frontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Results show the expected distractor-induced deafness effects in a reduction of target detection depending on the number of distractors. While tDCS had no significant effects on target detection per se, error rates due to missed cues are increased under stimulation. Thus, while our variant led to successful replication of behavioral deafness effects, the results under tDCS stimulation indicate that the chosen paradigm may have difficulty too low to respond to stimulation. That the error rates nevertheless led to a tDCS effect may be due to the divided attention between the visual cue and the auditory target.

Keywords: attention; conscious perception; distractor-induced deafness; transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Detection and error rates for missed cues (given as percentages), error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. (a) Detection rates depending on number of distractors and stimulation condition; (b) error rates for missed cues depending on number of distractors and stimulation condition.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sahraie A., Milders M., Niedeggen M. Attention induced motion blindness. Vis. Res. 2001;41:1613–1617. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00065-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Michael L., Hesselmann G., Kiefer M., Niedeggen M. Distractor-induced blindness for orientation changes and coherent motion. Vis. Res. 2011;51:1781–1787. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.06.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winther G.N., Niedeggen M. Adaptability and specificity of inhibition processes in distractor-induced blindness. Psychophysiology. 2017;54:1882–1898. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12974. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hesselmann G., Niedeggen M., Sahraie A., Milders M. Specifying the distractor inhibition account of attention-induced motion blindness. Vis. Res. 2006;46:1048–1056. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kern L., Niedeggen M. Distractor-induced deafness: The effect of multiple auditory distractors on conscious target processing. Cortex. 2021;134:181–194. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.10.015. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources