Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 9;19(12):7057.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127057.

Organizational and Supply Chain Impacts of 3D Printers Implementation in the Medical Sector

Fabio Musso  1 , Federica Murmura  1 , Laura Bravi  1
Affiliations

Organizational and Supply Chain Impacts of 3D Printers Implementation in the Medical Sector

Fabio Musso et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

3D printing application extends to various sectors, such as aerospace, construction, art, domestic, up to healthcare. It is in this domain that its adoption could offer technological solutions aimed at improving the individual life and guaranteeing organizational effectiveness. The aim of this study is to understand the way in which the adoption of medical 3D printers has introduced economic-business changes at the supply chain, organizational and environmental level within business processes considering the point of view of 3D printer manufacturers. A multiple case study has been developed, through the administration of a semi-structured interview to 7 Italian companies that design, manufacture and sell 3D printers offering additive technological solutions to the medical sector. The results show how companies believe that the organizational impact related to the adoption of this technology is quite significant, highlighting how it leads to the definition of a new organizational culture. Secondly, it emerges that the adoption of 3D printers within the medical sector also leads to a change in procedures and production activities. Finally, it also emerges that the impact at the supply chain level particularly affects the reduction in the number of players in the supply chain and product time to market.

Keywords: Industry 4.0; additive manufacturing; healthcare management; medical 3D printing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Bravi L., Murmura F., Santos G. Attitudes and behaviours of Italian 3D prosumer in the Era of Additive Manufacturing. Procedia Manuf. 2017;13:980–986. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.095. - DOI
    1. Hagel J., III, Brown J.S., Kulasooriya D., Giffi C., Chen M. The Future of Manufacturing-Making Things in a Changing World. Deloitte University Press; New York, NY, USA: 2015.
    1. Bal H.Ç., Erkan Ç. Industry 4.0 and competitiveness. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019;158:625–631. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.096. - DOI
    1. Paris H., Mandil G. Process planning for combined additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies in a remanufacturing context. J. Manuf. Syst. 2017;44:243–254. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.06.003. - DOI
    1. Watson J.K., Taminger K.M.B. A decision-support model for selecting additive manufacturing versus subtractive manufacturing based on energy consumption. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;176:1316–1322. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources