Limitations and Recommendations for Advancing the Occupational Therapy Workforce Research Worldwide: Scoping Review and Content Analysis of the Literature
- PMID: 35742593
- PMCID: PMC9224351
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127327
Limitations and Recommendations for Advancing the Occupational Therapy Workforce Research Worldwide: Scoping Review and Content Analysis of the Literature
Abstract
Occupational therapy workforce research can help determine whether occupational therapists exist in sufficient supply, are equitably distributed, and meet competency standards. Advancing the value of occupational therapy workforce research requires an understanding of the limitations and recommendations identified by these investigations. This scoping review and content analysis synthesizes the study limitations and recommendations reported by the occupational therapy research worldwide. Two independent reviews included 57 papers from the past 25 years. Stated limitations included: focus on cross-sectional studies with small and convenience samples; participants from single settings or regions; local markets or preferences not specified; focus on self-reported data and intentions (rather than behaviors or occurrences); challenges in aggregating or synthesizing findings from descriptive data; lack of statistical adjustment for testing multiple associations; and the lack of detailed, up-to-date, and accessible workforce data for continuous monitoring and secondary research. Stated recommendations included: strengthening routine workforce data collection; developing longitudinal studies that include interventions (e.g., recruitment or retention packages); developing context-sensitive comparisons; studying the impact on ultimate outcomes; promoting nation-wide, coordinated workforce plans and requirements; and fostering international coalitions for workforce research and developments at scale. These study limitations and recommendations reported by the literature must be considered in the design of a local and global occupational therapy workforce research agenda.
Keywords: health personnel; health workforce; human resources for health; occupational therapists; rehabilitation; review.
Conflict of interest statement
C.v.Z. and R.L. work for the World Federation of Occupational Therapists. Otherwise, the authors declare no conflict of interest. The funder had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Campbell J., Buchan J., Cometto G., David B., Dussault G., Fogstad H., Fronteira I., Lozano R., Nyonator F., Pablos-Méndez A., et al. Human resources for health and universal health coverage: Fostering equity and effective coverage. Bull. World Health Organ. 2013;91:853–863. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.118729. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization . Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health: Workforce 2030. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2016.
-
- Kuhlmann E., Batenburg R., Wismar M., Dussault G., Maier C.B., Glinos I.A., Azzopardi-Muscat N., Bond C., Burau V., Correia T., et al. A call for action to establish a research agenda for building a future health workforce in Europe. Health Res. Policy Syst. 2018;16:52. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0333-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
