Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 16;19(12):7365.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127365.

The Impact of Rural Population Mobility on Fertility Intention under the Comprehensive Two-Child Policy: Evidence from Rural China

Affiliations

The Impact of Rural Population Mobility on Fertility Intention under the Comprehensive Two-Child Policy: Evidence from Rural China

Qiang He et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Declining fertility rates pose challenges to global economic, social, cultural and political development. Low fertility rates among rural floating populations are exacerbating these challenges. However, it is not clear whether and to what extent rural population mobility (RPM) has reduced migrants' willingness to have children. At the same time, rural migration may represent a self-selection behavior (i.e., selection bias), and traditional measurement methods may be insufficient for effectively estimating the quantitative impacts of rural migration. Accordingly, the data from 1734 rural households from 28 provinces in mainland China were collected in the current study, and endogenous switching regression (ESR) models were used to correct the selection bias to quantitatively evaluate the impacts of RPM on fertility intention. The results revealed the following: (1) For rural residents who choose to move, if they chose not to move, their willingness to give birth would increase by 19.820%, their willingness to have female children would increase by 48.526%, and their willingness to have male children would drop by 26.711%. (2) For rural residents who choose not to move, if they chose to move, their willingness to give birth would drop by 55.982%, their willingness to have female children would drop by 18.294%, and their willingness to have male children would drop by 55.106%. (3) For eastern rural residents who choose to move, if they chose not to move, their willingness to give birth would decrease by 40.273%. For midwestern rural residents who choose to move, if they chose not to move, their willingness to give birth would increase by 24.786%. (4) For eastern rural residents who choose not to move, if they chose to move, their willingness to give birth would increase by 11.032%. (5) For midwestern rural residents who choose not to move, if they chose to move, their willingness to give birth would drop by 71.744%. The abovementioned findings can provide research support for other low-fertility countries or regions toward increasing fertility rates and addressing any imbalances in current gender ratios. They can also help to provide realistic strategies for alleviating the global population crisis.

Keywords: ESR model; RPM; fertility intention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
China’s birth rates, death rates, natural growth rates and total population.

References

    1. Vollset S.E., Goren E., Yuan C.-W., Cao J., Smith A.E., Hsiao T., Bisignano C., Azhar G.S., Castro E., Chalek J., et al. Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: A forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;396:1285–1306. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30677-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bumpass L.L., Rindfuss R.R., Choe M.K., Tsuya N.O. The institutional context of low fertility: The case of Japan. Asian Popul. Stud. 2009;5:215–235. doi: 10.1080/17441730903351479. - DOI
    1. Lee S., Choi H. Low and Lower Fertility. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2015. Lowest-Low Fertility and Policy Responses in South Korea; pp. 107–123.
    1. Puig-Barrachina V., Rodríguez-Sanz M., Domínguez-Berjón M.F., Martín U., Luque M.A., Ruiz M., Pérez G. Decline in fertility induced by economic recession in Spain. Gac. Sanit. 2019;34:238–244. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.05.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeng Y., Hesketh T. The effects of China’s universal two-child policy. Lancet. 2016;388:1930–1938. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31405-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types