Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 20;19(12):7536.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127536.

The Impact of Air Pollution on Residents' Happiness: A Study on the Moderating Effect Based on Pollution Sensitivity

Xuan Tian  1 , Cheng Zhang  2 , Bing Xu  3
Affiliations

The Impact of Air Pollution on Residents' Happiness: A Study on the Moderating Effect Based on Pollution Sensitivity

Xuan Tian et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Promoting people's happiness is a vital goal of public policy, and air pollution, as the focus of public opinion, is an important influencing factor of residents' happiness. Although previous literature has explored the relationship between air pollution and happiness, the impact of pollution sensitivity on the relationship has so far received little attention. This paper uses the 2016 China Labor-force Dynamics Survey database (CLDS) to study the impact of air pollution on personal happiness and dissects the moderating effect of air pollution sensitivity from the stock and incremental perspectives. The results found that (1) there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between air pollution and residents' happiness, such that happiness increases and then decreases with increasing air pollution. The PM10 concentration at the turning point is 119.69 μg/m3, which exceeds the national secondary standard limit (70 μg/m3) by 70.99% and is at the intermediate stage of mild pollution, exceeding the WHO recommended standard (20 μg/m3) by 498.45%, far higher than the international standard recommended level; (2) both air pollution stock sensitivity and incremental sensitivity have a significant positive moderating effect on the relationship between air pollution and happiness, and pollution sensitivity exacerbates the negative effect of air pollution on residents' happiness by shifting the curve turning point to the left and steepening the curve shape; (3) in addition, the effect of air pollution on different groups is significantly heterogeneous, with lower-age and male groups more likely to have lower happiness due to air pollution; the positive moderating effect of pollution sensitivity is more significant in lower-age, female, and higher-income groups. Therefore, in order to enhance residents' happiness, the government should not only improve air quality, but also focus on helping residents establish an appropriate subjective perception of air quality.

Keywords: happiness; objective air pollution; pollution sensitivity; subjective air pollution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kernel density map of objective air pollution distribution under different subjective air pollution levels.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Theoretical model.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Du G., Shin K.J., Managi S. Variability in impact of air pollution on subjective well-being. Atmos. Environ. 2018;183:175–208. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.018. - DOI
    1. Keyes C.L.M. Social Well-Being. Soc. Psychol. Q. 1998;61:121–140. doi: 10.2307/2787065. - DOI
    1. Zhang C., Zhao Z., Wang Q., Xu B. Holistic governance strategy to reduce carbon intensity. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022;179:121600. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121600. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferreira S., Moro M. On the Use of Subjective Well-Being Data for Environmental Valuation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2010;46:249–273. doi: 10.1007/s10640-009-9339-8. - DOI
    1. Levinson A. Valuing public goods using happiness data: The case of air quality. J. Public Econ. 2012;96:869–880. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.06.007. - DOI

Publication types