Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May 31;58(6):747.
doi: 10.3390/medicina58060747.

Current Concepts and Future Trends in Increasing the Benefits of Cochlear Implantation: A Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Current Concepts and Future Trends in Increasing the Benefits of Cochlear Implantation: A Narrative Review

Cristina Maria Blebea et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Hearing loss is the most common neurosensory disorder, and with the constant increase in etiological factors, combined with early detection protocols, numbers will continue to rise. Cochlear implantation has become the gold standard for patients with severe hearing loss, and interest has shifted from implantation principles to the preservation of residual hearing following the procedure itself. As the audiological criteria for cochlear implant eligibility have expanded to include patients with good residual hearing, more attention is focused on complementary development of otoprotective agents, electrode design, and surgical approaches. The focus of this review is current aspects of preserving residual hearing through a summary of recent trends regarding surgical and pharmacological fundamentals. Subsequently, the assessment of new pharmacological options, novel bioactive molecules (neurotrophins, growth factors, etc.), nanoparticles, stem cells, and gene therapy are discussed.

Keywords: cochlear implant; deafness; dexamethasone; hearing loss; nanomaterials; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Eshraghi A.A., Nazarian R., Telischi F.F., Rajguru S.M., Truy E., Gupta C. The Cochlear Implant: Historical Aspects and Future Prospects. Anat. Rec. 2012;295:1967–1980. doi: 10.1002/ar.22580. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lehnhardt E. Intracochlear Placement of Cochlear Implant Electrodes in Soft Surgery Technique. HNO. 1993;41:356–359. - PubMed
    1. Friedland D.R., Runge-Samuelson C. Soft Cochlear Implantation: Rationale for the Surgical Approach. Trends Amplif. 2009;13:124–138. doi: 10.1177/1084713809336422. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. El-Anwar M.W., Elaassar A.S., Foad Y.A. Non-Mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review. Int. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;20:180–184. doi: 10.1055/S-0035-1558871. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pau H.W., Just T., Bornitz M., Lasurashvilli N., Zahnert T. Noise Exposure of the Inner Ear during Drilling a Cochleostomy for Cochlear Implantation. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:535–540. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31802f4169. - DOI - PubMed