Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 11;58(6):787.
doi: 10.3390/medicina58060787.

Predicting Severity of Acute Pancreatitis

Affiliations
Review

Predicting Severity of Acute Pancreatitis

Dong Wook Lee et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis has a diverse etiology and natural history, and some patients have severe complications with a high risk of mortality. The prediction of the severity of acute pancreatitis should be achieved by a careful ongoing clinical assessment coupled with the use of a multiple-factor scoring system and imaging studies. Over the past 40 years, various scoring systems have been suggested to predict the severity of acute pancreatitis. However, there is no definite and ideal scoring system with a high sensitivity and specificity. The interest in new biological markers and predictive models for identifying severe acute pancreatitis testifies to the continued clinical importance of early severity prediction. Although contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing pancreatic necrosis, early scanning for the prediction of severity is limited because the full extent of pancreatic necrosis may not develop within the first 48 h of presentation. This article provides an overview of the available scoring systems and biochemical markers for predicting severe acute pancreatitis, with a focus on their characteristics and limitations.

Keywords: acute pancreatitis; predicting factors; severity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Banks P.A., Bollen T.L., Dervenis C., Gooszen H.G., Johnson C.D., Sarr M.G., Tsiotos G.G., Vege S.S., Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: Revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62:102–111. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013;13((Suppl. 2)):e1–e15. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.07.063. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Párniczky A., Kui B., Szentesi A., Balazs A., Szucs A., Moszbacher D., Czimmer J., Sarlos P., Bajor J., Godi S., et al. Prospective, multicentre, nationwide clinical data from 600 cases of acute pancreatitis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0165309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165309. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silva-Vaz P., Abrantes A.M., Castelo-Branco M., Gouveia A., Botelho M.F., Tralhão J.G. Murine models of acute pancreatitis: A critical appraisal of clinical relevance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:2794. doi: 10.3390/ijms20112794. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirota M., Takada T., Kawarada Y., Hirata K., Mayumi T., Yoshida M., Sekimoto M., Kimura Y., Takeda K., Isaji S., et al. JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: Severity assessment of acute pancreatitis. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13:33–41. doi: 10.1007/s00534-005-1049-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources