Pain during cardiac implantable electronic device implantation
- PMID: 35747068
- PMCID: PMC9063704
- DOI: 10.5837/bjc.2021.043
Pain during cardiac implantable electronic device implantation
Abstract
In order to evaluate the extent and causes of pain during cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation in our hospital, a prospective audit over a 23-month period using a patient selfreporting questionnaire was undertaken. In total, 599 procedures were reported, 52.9% for de novo pacemaker implantation and 23.4% for high-energy devices (cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator [CRT-D], implantable cardiac defibrillator [ICD], subcutaneous ICD). Overall, the median pain score was 2/10 (interquartile range 2-4). In total, 61.6% (367/599) reported no pain or mild pain (pain scores 0-3/10), 27.7% (165/599) reported moderate pain (pain score of 4-6/10) and 10.7% (64/599) reported severe pain (pain score of 7-10/10) during the procedure. Significant preimplant worry (odds ratio [OR] 2.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22 to 3.73) and higher lidocaine doses (OR 1.06, 95%CI 1.00 to 1.11) were associated with severe patient-reported pain. In conclusion, most patients underwent CIED implantation with minimum stress and maximum comfort. An important minority reported severe pain during the procedure. Optimising surgical technique and interventions targeted at reducing pre- and peri-implant worry, particularly in women, and especially in those receiving ICDs, warrants further investigation to reduce patient-reported pain during CIED implantation.
Keywords: anxiety; cardiac implantable electronic device; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; pain.
Copyright © 2021 Medinews (Cardiology) Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: DW reports grants from Boston Scientific ISR Lite Grant, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Astrazeneca, other from Medtronic, outside the submitted work. All other authors: none.
Figures
References
-
- Boney O, Bell M, Bell N, et al. Identifying research priorities in anaesthesia and perioperative care: final report of the joint National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia/James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e010006. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(suppl 11):S240–S252. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources