Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 20;10(6):e4400.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004400. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Assessing Use of Gender Diverse Language in Patient Education Materials on Breast Reconstruction

Affiliations

Assessing Use of Gender Diverse Language in Patient Education Materials on Breast Reconstruction

Lauren E Powell et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Utilizing inclusive terminology in patient education materials is an increasing area of focus in plastic surgery. Over 300,000 cases of breast cancer were diagnosed in 2020, affecting cisgender and gender diverse patients alike. Both cisgender and gender diverse patients may choose to undergo breast reconstruction. This study aims to assess the use of inclusive language in online patient education materials on reconstruction after breast cancer.

Methods: Materials were collected from all academic hospitals with a plastic surgery integrated and/or independent residency program, 97 in total. Programs were further classified by the presence of a comprehensive gender program. Materials were analyzed for gender diverse terminology outlined by the National LGBTQIA+ Health Education Center. A chi-square test evaluated for statistical significance of inclusive terminology based on the presence or absence of a comprehensive gender program.

Results: The majority (75%) of programs referenced cis women alone, with 25% referring to both men and women or using gender neutral terms such as "patients." Although most (85%) programs wrote in second person ("you"), 15% used she/her/hers pronouns alone, and no programs utilized gender diverse language outlined by the National LGBTQIA+ Health Education Center. The presence or absence of a comprehensive gender program was not predictive of the use of inclusive terminology (P = 0.32).

Conclusions: This study found that only 25% of breast reconstruction materials contained inclusive gender terminology. Plastic surgeons should provide patient education materials with language that supports members of a gender diverse population to facilitate a safe, inclusive space and conversation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Of 97 total programs with an independent and/or integrated plastic and reconstructive surgery residency program, 72 programs referenced women alone in breast reconstruction patient education materials, and 25 programs did not specify gender within patient education materials (instead used the nonspecific “you” or the term “patient”); however, none of the programs utilized specific gender diverse terminology.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Use of gender diverse pronouns in breast reconstruction patient education materials as outlined by the National LGBTQIA+ Health Education Center. Although 15 programs used exclusively “she/her” pronouns, 83 used nonspecific pronouns (such as “you” or the term “patients”). No programs utilized “he/his,” “sie/zie,” “ze,” or “they.”

References

    1. Massie JP, Streed CG, Neira PM, et al. . Terminology in transgender patient care. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:317e–183. - PubMed
    1. Morrison SD, Dy GW, Chong HJ, et al. . Transgender-related education in plastic surgery and urology residency programs. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9:178–183. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grant J, Mottet L, Tanis J, et al. . Injustice at every turn: A report of the national transgender discrimination survey [National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force website]. 2011. Available at https://www.transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/resources/NTDS_Re.... Accessed January 20, 2021.
    1. Kachen A, Pharr JR. Health care access and utilization by transgender populations: a United States Transgender Survey study. Transgend Health. 2020;5:141–148. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casey LS, Reisner SL, Findling MG, et al. . Discrimination in the United States: experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Americans. Health Serv Res. 2019;54 Suppl 2:1454–1466. - PMC - PubMed