Variations in common operations in athletes and non-Athletes
- PMID: 35747324
- PMCID: PMC9209869
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.06.006
Variations in common operations in athletes and non-Athletes
Abstract
Background: Achieving pre-injury activity level after an injury is the fundamental goal of any orthopedic treatment for an athlete. Unfortunately, pre-injury activity levels differ significantly in different patient categories, especially in athletes and non-athlete. Hence, an outcome suitable to a non-athlete may not be adequate for an athlete. This has led to variations in the surgical approach to the same injury in an athlete and non-athlete.There is plenty of literature published comparing the outcome in athletes and non-athletes after a particular surgery. Scattered discussion about variations in these surgeries based on functional demand was done in many publications. But there was a lack of a comprehensive narrative review summarizing variations in common operations among athletes and non-athletes.
Aim: This review attempted to summarize variations in common sports operations between high functional demand patients and low demand patients and discuss the variations from the author's perspective.
Methods: A review of all the relevant papers were conducted focusing on athletes and non-athletes. Most commonly performed sports surgeries were ACL reconstruction, Meniscal repair, PCL reconstruction, and Shoulder instability surgery. A literature search was done for each commonly performed surgery using relevant keywords in PubMed and Google Scholars. Summary of papers pertinent to athletes and non-athletes were compiled to prepare this narrative review.
Results: There is a lack of papers directly comparing results in athletes and non-athletes. However, many research papers discussed surgical variations in athletes (high demand) and non-athletes (low demand) patients. There are controversies in all commonly performed surgeries, and none of the papers gives a definitive guideline on the approach to athletes and non-athlete.
Conclusion: Rather than a common suggestion on surgical variation, an individualized approach would be appropriate to decide on variation in particular surgery in both athletes and non-athletes.
Keywords: ACL; Athlete; Bankart; Nonathlete; Variations.
© 2022 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
References
-
- Araújo C.G.S., Scharhag J. Athlete: a working definition for medical and health sciences research. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Jan 1;26(1):4–7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26750158/ [Internet] [cited 2022 Mar 7] Available from: - PubMed
-
- Pelliccia A., Fagard R., Bjørnstad H.H., et al. Recommendations for competitive sports participation in athletes with cardiovascular disease: a consensus document from the study group of sports Cardiology of the working group of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise physiology and the working group of myocardial and pericardial diseases of the European society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2005;26(14) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15923204/ [Internet] [cited 2022 Mar 7] Available from: - PubMed
-
- Maron B.J., Zipes D.P. Introduction: eligibility recommendations for competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities-general considerations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Apr 19;45(8) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15837280/ [Internet] [cited 2022 Mar 7] 1318–21. Available from: - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
