Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 7:9:885989.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.885989. eCollection 2022.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Surgical Treatment for Klippel-Feil Syndrome

Affiliations

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Surgical Treatment for Klippel-Feil Syndrome

Linyao Ding et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Recently, there have been some reports on surgical treatment for Klippel-Feil syndrome, but the prevalence and risk factors of surgery have not been well evaluated. This study sought to find the prevalence and potential risk factors of surgical treatment.

Methods: A retrospective radiographic review of 718 Klippel-Feil syndrome patients seen at Peking University Third Hospital from January 2010 to October 2017 was performed. Parameters included age, gender, deformity, cervical instability, Samartzis classification, and surgical treatment. Based on the surgical treatment they received, patients were divided into a surgery group and a non-surgery group. Prevalence and possible risk factors of surgical treatment were assessed.

Results: A total of 718 Klippel-Feil syndrome patients, including 327 men and 391 women, with an average age of 46.8 years were enrolled. According to the Samartzis classification scheme, 621 cases (86.5%) were classified as type I, 48 cases (6.7%) were classified as type II, and 49 cases (6.8%) were classified as type III, respectively. The most commonly fused segments were C2-3 (54.9%) and C5-6 (9.3%). Of all 718 patients, 133 (18.5%) patients underwent surgical treatment, mainly via the posterior approach (69.9%). The clinical factors included age, gender, deformity, instability, and Samartzis classification. Men were more likely to require surgical treatment (p < 0.001). Patients with instability (p < 0.001) or patients with deformity (p = 0.004) were also more likely to undergo surgery. All three of these variables were included in the binary regression analysis. Finally, gender (p < 0.001) and unstable joints (p < 0.001) were identified to be independently associated with surgical treatment. Gender was the most important risk factor with men being 2.39 times more likely to have surgical treatment, while patients with instability were 2.31 times more likely to receive surgery.

Conclusion: The prevalence of patients with Klippel-Feil syndrome requiring surgery was 18.5%, with the majority undergoing posterior cervical surgery. Gender and instability were indemnified as independent risk factors leading to surgical treatment.

Keywords: Klippel–Feil syndrome; Samartzis classification; prevalence; risk factors; surgical treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patients with Klippel–Feil syndrome (KFS) and occipital fusion. Examples of different types of KFS patients with occipital fusion: type I – (A) computed tomography (CT) scan and (D) radiograph showing C2–3 single fusion with occipital fusion; type II – (B) CT scan and (E) radiograph showing noncontiguous levels of fusion (C2–3 and C4–5) with occipital fusion; type III – (C) CT scan and (F) radiograph showing three levels of contiguous fusion at C5-7 with occipital fusion. The site of fusions is indicated by arrows.

References

    1. Saker E, Loukas M, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS. The intriguing history of vertebral fusion anomalies: the Klippel–Feil syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst. (2016) 32(9):1599–602. 10.1007/s00381-016-3173-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frikha R. Klippel–Feil syndrome: a review of the literature. Clin Dysmorphol. (2020) 29(1):35–7. 10.1097/mcd.0000000000000301 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Samartzis D, Kalluri P, Herman J, Lubicky JP, Shen FH. “Clinical Triad” findings in pediatric Klippel–Feil patients. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. (2016) 11:15. 10.1186/s13013-016-0075-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greipp ME. Klippel–Feil syndrome. Orthop Nurs. (1992) 11(5):13–8. 10.1097/00006416-199209000-00004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mahiroğullari M, Ozkan H, Yildirim N, Cilli F, Güdemez E. Klippel–Feil syndrome and associated congenital abnormalities: evaluation of 23 cases. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. (2006) 40(3):234–9. - PubMed