Adoption of Single-Use Clean Intermittent Catheterization Policies Does Not Appear to Affect Genitourinary Outcomes in a Large Spinal Cord Injury Cohort
- PMID: 35748685
- DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002836
Adoption of Single-Use Clean Intermittent Catheterization Policies Does Not Appear to Affect Genitourinary Outcomes in a Large Spinal Cord Injury Cohort
Abstract
Purpose: In April 2008, Medicare amended its policy for clean intermittent catheterization, increasing coverage from 4 reused catheters per month to up to 200 single-use catheters. The primary reason for the policy change was an assumed decrease in risk of urinary tract infection with single-use catheters. Given its economic/environmental impact (∼50-fold increase in cost and plastic waste) and a paucity of supporting evidence, we retrospectively evaluate the policy's effect in a prospective spinal cord injury registry.
Materials and methods: We accessed data for the years 1995 to 2020 from the National Spinal Cord Injury Database focusing on 1-year follow-up in those unable to volitionally void after injury. We asked 2 questions: (1) Did hospitalizations for genitourinary reasons decrease after the clean intermittent catheterization policy change?; and (2) Did clean intermittent catheterization adoption and adherence increase after the clean intermittent catheterization policy change?
Results: During the study period, 2,657 of the 6,843 (38.8%) participants unable to volitionally void after spinal cord injury were hospitalized during their first follow-up year. Of the cohort performing clean intermittent catheterization, fewer individuals were hospitalized for genitourinary reasons prior to the clean intermittent catheterization policy change compared to after (10.6% vs 14.6%, P < .001), a finding that persisted on multivariate logistic regression (odds radio, 0.67, P < .001). In addition, the number of individuals performing clean intermittent catheterization at 1-year follow-up was less after the policy change compared to prior (57.0% vs 59.1%, P = .044).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest the 2008 policy change shifting clean intermittent catheterization coverage from catheter reuse to single-use did not decrease hospitalizations for urinary tract infection or increase clean intermittent catheterization uptake in individuals with spinal cord injury.
Keywords: intermittent urethral catheterization; spinal cord injuries; urinary tract infections.
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2022 Nov;208(5):1074. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002836.02. Epub 2022 Aug 16. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35971791 No abstract available.
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2022 Nov;208(5):1073-1074. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002836.01. Epub 2022 Aug 16. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35971792 No abstract available.
-
Evaluating the Efficacy of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Intermittent Catheter Policy Requires a Multifaceted Approach. Letter.J Urol. 2023 Mar;209(3):509. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003151. Epub 2023 Jan 11. J Urol. 2023. PMID: 36629378 No abstract available.
-
Adoption of Single-Use Clean Intermittent Catheterization Policies Does Not Appear to Affect Genitourinary Outcomes in a Large Spinal Cord Injury Cohort. Letter.J Urol. 2023 Dec;210(6):842-843. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003691. Epub 2023 Sep 29. J Urol. 2023. PMID: 37774504 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
