Machine learning-based radiomics for histological classification of parotid tumors using morphological MRI: a comparative study
- PMID: 35748897
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08943-9
Machine learning-based radiomics for histological classification of parotid tumors using morphological MRI: a comparative study
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning models based on morphological magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics in the classification of parotid tumors.
Methods: In total, 298 patients with parotid tumors were randomly assigned to a training and test set at a ratio of 7:3. Radiomics features were extracted from the morphological MRI images and screened using the Select K Best and LASSO algorithm. Three-step machine learning models with XGBoost, SVM, and DT algorithms were developed to classify the parotid neoplasms into four subtypes. The ROC curve was used to measure the performance in each step. Diagnostic confusion matrices of these models were calculated for the test cohort and compared with those of the radiologists.
Results: Six, twelve, and eight optimal features were selected in each step of the three-step process, respectively. XGBoost produced the highest area under the curve (AUC) for all three steps in the training cohort (0.857, 0.882, and 0.908, respectively), and for the first step in the test cohort (0.826), but produced slightly lower AUCs than SVM in the latter two steps in the test cohort (0.817 vs. 0.833, and 0.789 vs. 0.821, respectively). The total accuracies of XGBoost and SVM in the confusion matrices (70.8% and 59.6%) outperformed those of DT and the radiologist (46.1% and 49.2%).
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that machine learning models based on morphological MRI radiomics might be an assistive tool for parotid tumor classification, especially for preliminary screening in absence of more advanced scanning sequences, such as DWI.
Key points: • Machine learning algorithms combined with morphological MRI radiomics could be useful in the preliminary classification of parotid tumors. • XGBoost algorithm performed better than SVM and DT in subtype differentiation of parotid tumors, while DT seemed to have a poor validation performance. • Using morphological MRI only, the XGBoost and SVM algorithms outperformed radiologists in the four-type classification task for parotid tumors, thus making these models a useful assistant diagnostic tool in clinical practice.
Keywords: Algorithms; Diagnosis; Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Parotid tumor.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
Similar articles
-
Performance of radiomics in the differential diagnosis of parotid tumors: a systematic review.Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 25;14:1383323. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1383323. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39119093 Free PMC article. Review.
-
CT-based radiomics analysis of different machine learning models for differentiating benign and malignant parotid tumors.Eur Radiol. 2022 Oct;32(10):6953-6964. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08830-3. Epub 2022 Apr 29. Eur Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35484339
-
Using Machine Learning on MRI Radiomics to Diagnose Parotid Tumours Before Comparing Performance with Radiologists: A Pilot Study.J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Jun;38(3):1496-1508. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01255-y. Epub 2024 Oct 10. J Imaging Inform Med. 2025. PMID: 39390287 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic performance of MRI-based radiomics models using machine learning approaches for the triple classification of parotid tumors.Heliyon. 2024 Aug 22;10(17):e36601. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36601. eCollection 2024 Sep 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39263059 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic Resonance-Guided Cancer Therapy Radiomics and Machine Learning Models for Response Prediction.Tomography. 2024 Sep 2;10(9):1439-1454. doi: 10.3390/tomography10090107. Tomography. 2024. PMID: 39330753 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Preoperative CT-based intra- and peri-tumoral radiomic models for differentiating benign and malignant tumors of the parotid gland: a two-center study.Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Sep 15;14(9):4445-4458. doi: 10.62347/AXQW1100. eCollection 2024. Am J Cancer Res. 2024. PMID: 39417193 Free PMC article.
-
MR Image Fusion-Based Parotid Gland Tumor Detection.J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Jun;38(3):1846-1859. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01137-3. Epub 2024 Sep 26. J Imaging Inform Med. 2025. PMID: 39327379 Free PMC article.
-
Distinguishing atypical parotid carcinomas and pleomorphic adenomas based on multiphasic computed tomography radiomics nomogram: a multicenter study.Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 1;15:1625487. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1625487. eCollection 2025. Front Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40823096 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of radiomics in the differential diagnosis of parotid tumors: a systematic review.Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 25;14:1383323. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1383323. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39119093 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Parotid cancer: analysis of preoperative parameters for adaptation of the therapeutic strategy.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jun;281(6):3207-3218. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08607-y. Epub 2024 Apr 3. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 38568298
References
-
- Gatta G, Guzzo M, Locati LD, McGurk M, Prott FJ (2020) Major and minor salivary gland tumours. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 152:102959 - PubMed
-
- Spiro RH (1986) Salivary neoplasms: overview of a 35-year experience with 2,807 patients. Head Neck Surg 8:177–184 - PubMed
-
- Lewis AG, Tong T, Maghami E (2016) Diagnosis and management of malignant salivary gland tumors of the parotid gland. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 49:343–380 - PubMed
-
- Liu CC, Jethwa AR, Khariwala SS, Johnson J, Shin JJ (2016) Sensitivity, specificity, and posttest probability of parotid fine-needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 154:9–23 - PubMed
-
- Singh Nanda KD, Mehta A, Nanda J (2012) Fine-needle aspiration cytology: a reliable tool in the diagnosis of salivary gland lesions. J Oral Pathol Med 41:106–112 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- 820773009/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- 81974424/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- 81874133/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- 81772903/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- 81773243/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- 81701847/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- 2019JJ40481/Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province
- 2018RS3024/Huxiang Young Talent Project
- 2018Q019/Young Scientist Research Fund of Xiangya Hospital
- 2020YFC1316900/National Key Research and Development Program of China
- 2020YFC1316901/National Key Research and Development Program of China
- 2021JJ41012/Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources