Application of electromagnetic navigation in endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a cohort study
- PMID: 35748953
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07280-1
Application of electromagnetic navigation in endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a cohort study
Abstract
Study design: Clinical retrospective cohort study.
Objectives: To explore the application of the electromagnetic navigation system in Endo-TLIF.
Materials and methods: From May 2019 to March 2020, 76 patients with single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis treated by electromagnetic navigation-assisted Endo-TLIF (NE group) and conventional Endo-TLIF (CE group) were enrolled in the study. Time of pedicle screw implantation, entire operation time, the number of intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy exposures, total blood loss, incision length, ambulation time, accuracy of pedicle screws, complications, visual analog scale for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, Japanese Orthopedic Association score and postoperative fusion rates were recorded, respectively.
Results: There were no significant differences in preoperative demographics between the NE and CE groups (P > 0.05). The mean number of intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy exposures, guidewires insertion, entire operation time, total blood loss and adjustment rate of screws in the NE group were significantly less compared with the CE group (P < 0.05, respectively). There were no significant differences in clinical parameters between the two groups at different time points in the follow-up period (P > 0.05). There was no statistical difference in fusion rates between the two groups. In addition, one case of cage subsidence was observed after surgery in the CE group.
Conclusion: Electromagnetic navigation systems could be applied throughout the entire surgical course and ameliorate the shortcomings of the conventional Endo-TLIF technique to reduce radiation exposure, improve accuracy, avoid repetitive operations and shorten surgery time and the required learning curve of the procedure.
Level of evidence i: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.
Keywords: Electromagnetic navigation; Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Intraoperative fluoroscopy; Lumbar spondylolisthesis; Operation time.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Foley KT, Lefkowitz MA (2002) Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg 49:499–517 - PubMed
-
- Wang J, Zhou Y, Feng Zhang Z, Qing Li C, Jie Zheng W, Liu J (2014) Comparison of the clinical outcome in overweight or obese patients after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 27(4):202–206. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31825d68ac - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lin EY, Kuo YK, Kang YN (2018) Effects of three common lumbar interbody fusion procedures for degenerative disc disease: a network meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Surg 60:224–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.11.009 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zhang H, Zhou C, Wang C, Zhu K, Tu Q, Kong M et al (2021) Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique note and comparison of early outcomes with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Int J Gen Med 14:549–558. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.S298591 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Syed H, Voyadzis JM (2016) True percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: case illustrations, surgical technique, and limitations. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 77(4):344–353. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1558821 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials