Comments on "A Simple, Rapid, Comparative Evaluation of Multiple Products for Decontamination of Actinide-contaminated Rat Skin Ex Vivo"
- PMID: 35749616
- DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001575
Comments on "A Simple, Rapid, Comparative Evaluation of Multiple Products for Decontamination of Actinide-contaminated Rat Skin Ex Vivo"
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
A Simple, Rapid, Comparative Evaluation of Multiple Products for Decontamination of Actinide-contaminated Rat Skin Ex Vivo.Health Phys. 2022 Mar 1;122(3):371-382. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001506. Health Phys. 2022. PMID: 34966085
References
-
- AFNOR. Security and protection of citizens: Cbrn-e-protocols for performance assessment of technologies intended for undamaged skin decontamination. Association Française de Normalisation, La Plaine Saint-Denis, France, NF X32-122; 2016.
-
- Griffiths NM, Devilliers K, Laroche P, Van der Meeren A. A simple, rapid, comparative evaluation of multiple products for decontamination of actinide-contaminated rat skin ex vivo. Health Phys 122:371–382; 2022.
-
- Grivès S, Phan G, Bouvier-Capely C, Suhard D, Rebière F, Agarande M, Fattal E. Compared in vivo efficiency of nanoemulsions unloaded and loaded with calixarene and soapy water in the treatment of superficial wounds contaminated by uranium. Chemico-Biological Interactions 267:33–39; 2017.
-
- Grivès S, Phan G, Morat G, Suhard D, Rebiere F, Fattal E. Ex vivo uranium decontamination efficiency on wounded skin and in vitro skin toxicity of a calixarene-loaded nanoemulsion. J Pharma Sci 104:2008–2017; 2015.
-
- Tazrart A, Bolzinger MA, Lamart S, Coudert S, Angulo JF, Jandard V, Briançon S, Griffiths NM. Actinide-contaminated skin: comparing decontamination efficacy of water, cleansing gels, and DTPA gels. Health Physics 115:12–20; 2018.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources