Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022:2493:331-351.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2293-3_21.

Preanalytical Variables and Sample Quality Control for Clinical Variant Analysis

Affiliations

Preanalytical Variables and Sample Quality Control for Clinical Variant Analysis

Ilaria Alborelli et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2022.

Abstract

Broad molecular profiling by next-generation sequencing of solid tumors has become a critical tool for clinical decision-making in the era of precision oncology. In addition to many already approved targeted therapies, more than half of ongoing oncology-related clinical trials are biomarker-driven. Therefore, accurate and reliable assays are needed to assess the genetic make-up of tumor cells and guide clinicians in the therapy decision process. In order to obtain high-quality NGS data for variant detection, certain preanalytical steps and quality metrics should be followed. These include assessment of sample types, choice of extraction method, library preparation technology, sequencing platform, and finally sequencing quality control. Each of these steps has certain challenges and pitfalls that need to be addressed and overcome, respectively. In this chapter, we address the preanalytical quality control and how each of the involved steps may influence the final result. Following these guidelines and QC metrics may help in obtaining optimal results that will allow the precise and robust assessment of genetic variants in a clinical setting.

Keywords: FFPE; Liquid biopsy; Molecular pathology; Next-generation sequencing; Preanalytical variable; Variant calling; ctDNA.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mosele F, Remon J, Mateo J et al (2020) Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with metastatic cancers: a report from the ESMO precision medicine working group. Ann Oncol 31:1491–1505 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Liu HE, Triboulet M, Zia A et al (2017) Workflow optimization of whole genome amplification and targeted panel sequencing for CTC mutation detection. NPJ Genom Med 2:34 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Bettegowda C, Sausen M, Leary RJ et al (2014) Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Sci Transl Med 6:224ra24 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Goodwin S, McPherson JD, McCombie WR (2016) Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat Rev Genet 17:333–351 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Hess JF, Kohl TA, Kotrová M, Rönsch K, Paprotka T, Mohr V, Hutzenlaub T, Brüggemann M, Zengerle R, Niemann S, Paust N (2020) Library preparation for next generation sequencing: A review of automation strategies. Biotechnol Adv 41:107537 - PubMed - DOI

LinkOut - more resources