Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;407(7):2801-2810.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02599-1. Epub 2022 Jun 25.

Is routine CT scan after pancreaticoduodenectomy a useful tool in the early detection of complications? A single center retrospective analysis

Affiliations

Is routine CT scan after pancreaticoduodenectomy a useful tool in the early detection of complications? A single center retrospective analysis

Michele Mazzola et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: The clinical impact of routine CT imaging after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has not been properly investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of routine CT scan after PD for the detection of postoperative complications.

Methods: Prospectively collected data of consecutive patients undergoing PD and receiving routine postoperative CT imaging were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was accuracy of CT imaging in identifying major complications. The secondary endpoint was identification of preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with severe complications. A subgroup analysis of CT scan accuracy in identifying severe complications in patients stratified by fistula risk score (FRS) and presence of early clinical alterations was also performed.

Results: A total of 145 patients were included. Routine CT scan had low specificity (Sp = 0.36) and high sensitivity (Sn = 0.98) for predicting major complications, with an accuracy of 0.57. At multivariate logistic regression analysis, only fistula moderate-high FRS (p = 0.029) was independently associated with severe complications. In patients with negligible-low FRS, CT scan showed a Sp of 0.63 and a Sn of 1.0 with an accuracy of 0.69. In patients with moderate-high FRS, CT scan had a Sp of 0.19, a Sn of 0.97 and an accuracy of 0.5. In the 20 (14%) patients with negligible-low FRS and no clinical alterations, no deaths or readmissions occurred regardless of CT findings, while one severe complication occurred in the positive CT scan group. In all other groups, no deaths or readmissions occurred in case of negative CT, with only one severe complication in the moderate-high FRS group with clinical alterations. In case of positive CT, the rate of severe complications was 47% in case of negligible-low FRS and clinical alterations, 40% in case of moderate-high FRS with no clinical alterations, and 45% in case of moderate-high FRS and clinical alterations.

Conclusions: Routine postoperative CT scan after PD should not be performed in patients with negligible-low FRS and no clinical alterations. In all other patients, a negative CT scan appears to be highly accurate in identifying patients who will have an uneventful course and who could benefit from early discharge.

Keywords: Mitigation strategy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Postoperative pancreatic fistula; Routine postoperative CT scan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McEvoy SH, Lavelle LP, Hoare SM et al (2014) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: expected post-operative anatomy and complications. B J Radiol 87:20140050. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140050 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Sánchez-Velázquez P, Muller X, Malleo G, et al (2020) Benchmarks in pancreatic surgery. A novel tool for unbiased outcome comparisons. HPB 22:S383. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003223
    1. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surg 161:584–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.1093 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosso E, Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, et al (2006) Toward zero pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy. Am J Surg 191:726–32; discussion 733–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.09.012
    1. Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R et al (2013) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 14:655–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70126-8 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources