Is routine CT scan after pancreaticoduodenectomy a useful tool in the early detection of complications? A single center retrospective analysis
- PMID: 35752718
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02599-1
Is routine CT scan after pancreaticoduodenectomy a useful tool in the early detection of complications? A single center retrospective analysis
Abstract
Purpose: The clinical impact of routine CT imaging after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has not been properly investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of routine CT scan after PD for the detection of postoperative complications.
Methods: Prospectively collected data of consecutive patients undergoing PD and receiving routine postoperative CT imaging were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was accuracy of CT imaging in identifying major complications. The secondary endpoint was identification of preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with severe complications. A subgroup analysis of CT scan accuracy in identifying severe complications in patients stratified by fistula risk score (FRS) and presence of early clinical alterations was also performed.
Results: A total of 145 patients were included. Routine CT scan had low specificity (Sp = 0.36) and high sensitivity (Sn = 0.98) for predicting major complications, with an accuracy of 0.57. At multivariate logistic regression analysis, only fistula moderate-high FRS (p = 0.029) was independently associated with severe complications. In patients with negligible-low FRS, CT scan showed a Sp of 0.63 and a Sn of 1.0 with an accuracy of 0.69. In patients with moderate-high FRS, CT scan had a Sp of 0.19, a Sn of 0.97 and an accuracy of 0.5. In the 20 (14%) patients with negligible-low FRS and no clinical alterations, no deaths or readmissions occurred regardless of CT findings, while one severe complication occurred in the positive CT scan group. In all other groups, no deaths or readmissions occurred in case of negative CT, with only one severe complication in the moderate-high FRS group with clinical alterations. In case of positive CT, the rate of severe complications was 47% in case of negligible-low FRS and clinical alterations, 40% in case of moderate-high FRS with no clinical alterations, and 45% in case of moderate-high FRS and clinical alterations.
Conclusions: Routine postoperative CT scan after PD should not be performed in patients with negligible-low FRS and no clinical alterations. In all other patients, a negative CT scan appears to be highly accurate in identifying patients who will have an uneventful course and who could benefit from early discharge.
Keywords: Mitigation strategy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Postoperative pancreatic fistula; Routine postoperative CT scan.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Computed tomography-adjusted fistula risk score for predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: Training and external validation of model upgrade.EBioMedicine. 2020 Dec;62:103096. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103096. Epub 2020 Nov 5. EBioMedicine. 2020. PMID: 33161232 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of clinically relevant Pancreatico-enteric Anastomotic Fistulas after Pancreatoduodenectomy using deep learning of Preoperative Computed Tomography.Theranostics. 2020 Aug 1;10(21):9779-9788. doi: 10.7150/thno.49671. eCollection 2020. Theranostics. 2020. PMID: 32863959 Free PMC article.
-
What is a better predictor of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD): postoperative day one drain amylase (POD1DA) or the fistula risk score (FRS)?HPB (Oxford). 2017 Jan;19(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Nov 4. HPB (Oxford). 2017. PMID: 27825541
-
"Mitigation strategies for post-operative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy in high-risk pancreas: an evidence-based algorithmic approach"-a narrative review.Chin Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb;11(1):6. doi: 10.21037/cco-22-6. Chin Clin Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35255695 Review.
-
[Complications of two types of pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy].Ann Chir. 1996;50(6):431-7. Ann Chir. 1996. PMID: 8991198 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Pancreatojejunostomy: standing on the shoulders of giants. A single centre retrospective analysis.Updates Surg. 2024 Jan;76(1):97-106. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01643-z. Epub 2023 Sep 7. Updates Surg. 2024. PMID: 37679576
-
Systematic approach to the post-Whipple CT: clinical cases and problem-solving strategies.Emerg Radiol. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s10140-025-02379-6. Online ahead of print. Emerg Radiol. 2025. PMID: 40916031
-
The cholinesterase and C-reactive protein score is a potential predictor of pseudoaneurysm formation after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with soft pancreas.BMC Surg. 2023 Nov 14;23(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02211-3. BMC Surg. 2023. PMID: 37964345 Free PMC article.
-
Biodegradable internal stent versus no stent for patients at increased risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center propensity score matching analysis.Updates Surg. 2025 Sep;77(5):1525-1533. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02252-8. Epub 2025 May 26. Updates Surg. 2025. PMID: 40418425
-
Endoscopic management of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single center retrospective analysis.Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul;39(7):4186-4194. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11786-2. Epub 2025 May 15. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 40372448
References
-
- McEvoy SH, Lavelle LP, Hoare SM et al (2014) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: expected post-operative anatomy and complications. B J Radiol 87:20140050. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140050 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Sánchez-Velázquez P, Muller X, Malleo G, et al (2020) Benchmarks in pancreatic surgery. A novel tool for unbiased outcome comparisons. HPB 22:S383. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003223
-
- Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surg 161:584–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.1093 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rosso E, Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, et al (2006) Toward zero pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy. Am J Surg 191:726–32; discussion 733–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.09.012
-
- Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R et al (2013) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 14:655–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70126-8 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources