Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 Feb;26(2):207-10.
doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(87)90106-7.

Effect of the chronic ingestion of chlorimipramine and desipramine on the hole board response to acute stresses in male rats

Effect of the chronic ingestion of chlorimipramine and desipramine on the hole board response to acute stresses in male rats

E L Rodríguez Echandía et al. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1987 Feb.

Abstract

The effect of the chronic ingestion of chlorimipramine (CI) or desipramine (DS) on the alterations of hole board behavior caused by a model stress (2 IP injections of physiological saline) and by a short restraint stress (5 min) is analyzed in this study. The experimental groups ingested about 3 mg/kg/24 hr CI or DS for 15 days. Then some experimental and control rats were assigned to control of drug effects on baseline activity. The remaining rats were submitted to saline stress (Experiment I) or restraint stress (Experiment II). The baseline scores of hole board locomotion, head dipping, grooming and defecation were not affected by DS treatment but locomotion slightly increased in the CI treated group. Saline stress impaired significantly head dipping and caused excessive grooming in control rats. The CI treatment induced almost full protection against these behavioral effects of saline stress but DS treatment was ineffective. Restraint stress was found to cause a pronounced inhibition of head dipping as well as a great increase of the scores of grooming in the control group. The CI treatment clearly attenuated these effects of restraint but DS treatment was not effective. The results suggest that male rats treated chronically with CI tolerated both acute stresses better than untreated rats, and that a similar treatment with DS did not provide protection against the effect of such stresses on hole board responding. Inasmuch as CI and DS have different relative potency at noradrenergic and serotonergic systems, it is speculated that this might be in part responsible for their differences as stress protectors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources