Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;52(5):294-298.
doi: 10.1016/j.idnow.2022.06.006. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

The presumed receptivity and susceptibility to monkeypox of European animal species

Affiliations

The presumed receptivity and susceptibility to monkeypox of European animal species

Nadia Haddad. Infect Dis Now. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

The Monkeypox virus belongs to the Orthopoxvius genus, as does the specifically human smallpox virus. It is zoonotic and had never previously been considered as capable of human-to-human transmission over more than nine viral generation cycles. While relevant animal reservoirs have yet to be identified, non-human primates (NHP) are only accidental hosts. The potentially high number of current human shedders during the clinical phase (3 weeks maximum) raises the question of a risk in our countries of animals being contaminated by infected humans (reverse zoonosis). Cats as well as cows are susceptible to the Cowpox virus, another zoonotic Orthopoxvirus, which they transmit to humans. Dogs are much less susceptible to this virus and seem only receptive to Vaccinia virus (also belonging to the Orthopoxvirus genus). On the other hand, one study has demonstrated the pronounced susceptibility of the adult albino rabbit and of young animals of several rodent species to Monkeypox virus (MPXV). Given the susceptibility to MPXV of prairie dogs, which are American Sciuridae, the potential for infection of European squirrels cannot be ruled out.

Keywords: Animal reservoir; Monkeypox; Reverse zoonosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Monkeypox epidemiology inside and outside of Africa: different periods in the evolution of zoonotic vs.human-to-human transmission.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nolen L.D., Osadebe L., Katomba J., Likofata J., Mukadi D., et al. Extended human-to-human transmission during a monkeypox outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:1014–1021. doi: 10.3201/eid2206.150579. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bunge E.M., Hoet B., Chen L., Lienert F., Weidenthaler H., et al. The changing epidemiology of human monkeypox-A potential threat?. A systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16:e0010141. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171089. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khodakevich L., Szczeniowski M., Nambu-ma-Disu, Jezek Z., Marennikova S., et al. Monkeypox virus in relation to the ecological features surrounding human settlements in Bumba zone, Zaire. Trop Geogr Med. 1987;39:56–63. - PubMed
    1. Tiee M.S., Harrigan R.J., Thomassen H.A., Smith T.B. Ghosts of infections past: using archival samples to understand a century of monkeypox virus prevalence among host communities across space and time. R Soc Open Sci. 2018;5:171089. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171089. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arita I., Henderson D.A. Smallpox and monkeypox in non-human primates. Bull World Health Organ. 1968;39:277–283. - PMC - PubMed