Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jun 26;22(1):175.
doi: 10.1186/s12906-022-03634-w.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the standard traditional Korean medicine-based health promotion program for disadvantaged children in South Korea

Eunhye Hyun #  1 , Jiseon Ryu #  2 , Kibong Kim  3 , Sangjae Lee  4 , Seungtae Kim  5 , Byungmook Lim  6
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the standard traditional Korean medicine-based health promotion program for disadvantaged children in South Korea

Eunhye Hyun et al. BMC Complement Med Ther. .

Abstract

Background: Traditional Korean Medicine (TKM) is highly integrated with the modern health care system of South Korea and is actively used in the public health field. Since 2014, the Ministry of Health and Welfare of South Korea has supported the development of standard models for TKM-based health promotion programs. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a standard TKM-based health promotion program for disadvantaged children.

Methods: Using convenience sampling, we recruited 16 Community Children's Centers (CCCs) located in Busan and Yangsan, South Korea, which are welfare daytime facilities for children from socially disadvantaged families. The CCCs were divided into two groups of eight CCCs-intervention CCCs and control CCCs-through random allocation, and children in each group were selected as subjects for the study. For 12 weeks, the TKM-based health promotion program developed in this study along with the basic services of CCCs were applied to children in the intervention group, and only the basic services of CCCs were provided to children in the control group. Data were obtained through pre- and post-surveys with the legal representatives of the children prior to implementing the program and after the 12-week program, respectively. The outcome variables-the number of outpatient visits, absences, lateness/early leaves, infectious symptoms, and EuroQol-5D and EQ-visual analog scale scores-were measured and statistically compared between the groups by descriptive analysis, chi-square test, t-test, and difference-in-differences model with regression analysis.

Results: At baseline, there were 156 children in the intervention group and 153 children in the control group, among which 155 and 147 children, respectively, were included in the analysis. Results indicated that the number of outpatient visits was significantly lower (by 65%) in the intervention group than in the control group (p = 0.03), and this was similar in the sensitivity analysis. Regarding other outcome variables, the effects were not consistently significant.

Conclusions: A standard TKM-based health promotion program has the potential to improve the health of disadvantaged children. In the future, studies with long-term interventions and a larger sample are needed to enhance the applicability of these programs in communities.

Keywords: Difference-in-differences model; Disadvantaged children; Health promotion; Quasi-experimental design; Traditional Korean Medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The result of participation and data collection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Change in Medical use and health status of children
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TAJ, Taylor S. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008;372(9650):1661–1669. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldfeld S, O’Connor M, Cloney D, Gray S, Redmond G, Badland H, et al. Understanding child disadvantage from a social determinants perspective. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72(3):223–229. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Case A, Fertig A, Paxson C. The lasting impact of childhood health and circumstance. J Health Econ. 2005;24(2):365–389. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pearce A, Dundas R, Whitehead M, Taylor-Robinson D. Pathways to inequalities in child health. Arch Dis Child. 2019;104(10):998–1003. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314808. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoghughi M. The importance of parenting in child health: doctors as well as the government should do more to support parents. BMJ. 1998;316(7144):1545–1550. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7144.1545. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources