Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;133(5):1122-1131.
doi: 10.1002/lary.30254. Epub 2022 Jun 26.

Primary Total Laryngectomy versus Organ Preservation for Locally Advanced T3/T4a Laryngeal Cancer

Affiliations

Primary Total Laryngectomy versus Organ Preservation for Locally Advanced T3/T4a Laryngeal Cancer

Maxwell Y Lee et al. Laryngoscope. 2023 May.

Abstract

Objective: Organ preservation (OP) treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer has increased compared to primary total laryngectomy. Our study compares oncologic and functional outcomes between these approaches.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Single tertiary care institution.

Methods: Retrospective review of patients receiving primary total laryngectomy or OP for laryngeal cancer between 1/1/2000 and 12/31/2018.

Results: A total of 118 patients received primary total laryngectomy and 119 received OP. Overall survival was similar between total laryngectomy and OP. When stratified by T stage, disease-free survival was worse among T3 patients receiving OP versus total laryngectomy. In T3 patients, 28 OP patients experienced local recurrence (28.9%) compared to 3 total laryngectomy patients (7.1%; p < 0.01). In total, 20 OP patients with local recurrence received salvage surgery. These patients had similar overall survival to patients who underwent initial total laryngectomy (TL). About 14 OP patients with local recurrence did not receive salvage surgery. About 89 (75.4%) TL patients achieved normal diet as compared to 64 (53.8%) OP patients (p < 0.001). In TL patients, 106 (89.8%) received primary or secondary tracheoesophageal-prosthesis, 82 (77.4%) of whom achieved completely understandable speech.

Conclusions: There was no difference in survival by treatment in T4 patients, possibly because of strict patient selection. However, disease-free survival was worse in T3 patients receiving OP, likely due to a high local recurrence rate. Approximately 40% of patients with local recurrence were not eligible for salvage laryngectomy. TL patients had comparable swallowing and speech outcomes with OP patients.

Level of evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:1122-1131, 2023.

Keywords: Laryngeal cancer; Larynx cancer; chemotherapy; radiation therapy; total laryngectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7-34. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21551.
    1. Hoffman HT, Porter K, Karnell LH, et al. Laryngeal cancer in the United States: changes in demographics, patterns of care, and survival. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(S111):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000236095.97947.26.
    1. Hawkins NV. Panel discussion on glottic tumors. VIII. The treatment of glottic carcinoma: an analysis of 800 cases. Laryngoscope. 1975;85(9):1485-1493. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-197509000-00009.
    1. Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group, Wolf GT, Fisher SG, et al. Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(24):1685-1690. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199106133242402.
    1. Forastiere AA, Weber RS, Trotti A. Organ preservation for advanced larynx cancer: issues and outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(29):3262-3268. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2978.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources