Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 4:11:22.
doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_149_21. eCollection 2022.

Comparative assessment of various cephalometric facial planes with intercanine width in orthodontic patients

Affiliations

Comparative assessment of various cephalometric facial planes with intercanine width in orthodontic patients

Erum Behroz Khan et al. J Orthod Sci. .

Abstract

Objective: The study was conducted to evaluate the relationship of various cephalometric skeletal patterns in the vertical and anteroposterior planes with intercanine width in untreated orthodontic patients.

Method and material: This study included dental cast and cephalometric radiographs of 100 patients (69 females and 31 males) of the age range 13 to 33 years. Skeletal parameters including SNA, SNB, SNMP angles were found from lateral cephalometric radiographs. Intercanine widths including upper intercanine widths (UICW) and lower intercanine widths (LICW) were measured by a digital caliper.

Results: The correlation of intercanine width with SNA, SNB, and SNMP angles was analyzed by applying Pearson correlation coefficient. According to statistical analysis, the only insignificant correlation was analyzed between UICW with SNB and LICW with SN-MP.

Conclusions: The overall result showed statistically significant relationship of various cephalometric skeletal patterns in the sagittal and vertical planes with intercanine width.

Keywords: Arch width; facial planes; inter canine width; sagittal and vertical skeletal pattern.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Aparna P, Kumar DN, Prasad M, Shamnur N, Kumar AG, Sridhar KR, et al. Comparative assessment of sagittal skeletal discrepancy: A cephalometric study? J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:ZC38–41. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13178.5824. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lux CJ, Conradt C, Burden D, Komposch G. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class II malocclusions between early mixed and permanent dentitions. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:674–85. - PubMed
    1. Henrikson J, Persson M, Thilander B. Long-term stability of dental arch form in normal occlusion from 13 to 31 years of age. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23:51–61. - PubMed
    1. Fleming PS, Lee RT, Mcdonald T, Pandis N, Johal A. The timing of significant arch dimensional changes with fixed orthodontic appliances: Data from a multicenter randomised controlled trial. J Dent. 2014;42:1–6. - PubMed
    1. Shahroudi AS, Etezadi T. Correlation between dental arch width and sagittal dento-skeletal morphology in untreated adults. J Dent (Tehran) 2013;10:522–31. - PMC - PubMed