Comparison of the efficacy of Icon resin infiltration and Clinpro XT varnish on remineralization of white spot lesions: An in-vitro study
- PMID: 35754423
- PMCID: PMC9214422
- DOI: 10.4103/jos.jos_141_21
Comparison of the efficacy of Icon resin infiltration and Clinpro XT varnish on remineralization of white spot lesions: An in-vitro study
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of Icon resin infiltration and Clinpro XT varnish on remineralization of white spot lesions using a polarized light microscope (PLM).
Materials & methods: Artificial white spot lesions were created on a sample of 40 extracted human premolar teeth by immersing in a demineralizing solution. All samples were randomly allocated to two groups of 20 each; Group A: Icon resin infiltration and Group B: Clinpro XT varnish. Teeth were sectioned along the buccolingual plane using a diamond disc. Specimens were observed under the PLM (4× magnification) at three deepest measurements and their averages were calculated to obtain the mean penetration depth. The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS software (version 22.0). Independent samples t-test and group statistics were used to compare the two groups. In all statistical tests, the significance level was set at 5% (P < 0.05).
Results: Both Icon resin infiltration and Clinpro XT groups showed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.00) in the penetration depth. Icon resin infiltration group showed a significantly higher penetration depth (24.46 μm) compared to the Clinpro XT group (12.34 μm). Group A showed a greater mean penetration depth (17.07 ± 4.35 μm) when compared to group B (7.68 ± 1.81 μm).
Conclusion: Icon resin infiltration showed a significantly higher penetration depth and is more effective on remineralization of white spot lesions when compared to Clinpro XT varnish.
Keywords: Clinpro XT varnish; icon resin infiltration; polarized light microscope; resin penetration depth; white spot lesions.
Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Orthodontic Science.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest
Figures
References
-
- Gorton J, Featherstone JD. In vivo inhibition of demineralization around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:10–4. - PubMed
-
- Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod. 1982;81:93–8. - PubMed
-
- Ogaard B, Rølla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization Part 1.Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:68–73. - PubMed
-
- Chang HS, Walsh LJ, Freer TJ. Enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment.Aetiology and prevention. Aust Dent J. 1997;42:322–7. - PubMed
-
- Boyd RL. Enhancing the value of orthodontic treatment: Incorporating effective preventive dentistry into treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:601–3. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources