Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 9:13:892574.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.892574. eCollection 2022.

Recommendations on Off-Label Drug Use in Pediatric Guidelines

Affiliations

Recommendations on Off-Label Drug Use in Pediatric Guidelines

Min Meng et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Objective: To systematically analyze the supporting evidence, drug information, and the type of off-label drug use in recommendations on off-label drug use in pediatric guidelines. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed by systematic search through MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Embase databases to identify literature published from 1 January 2018, to 31 December 2020. Only pediatric clinical practice guidelines that included recommendations on off-label use of drugs were included. We present descriptive information on the sources of the included guidelines, country, publication year, evidence grading system used, details on the types of off-label drug use, and the types of studies used as references to support the recommendations. Results: A total of 66 pediatric guidelines with 605 recommendations were included. Eighty-seven (14.4%) recommendations did not cite any references; and the remaining 518 recommendations were supported by 2,240 references (mean 4.3 references/recommendation). The most common types of studies cited were pediatric RCTs (n = 314, 14.0%), pediatric case series studies (n = 260, 11.6%), and reviews (n = 255, 11.4%). Twenty-one percent (n = 470) of the references were studies on adults. One hundred and forty (23.1%) recommendations were graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system, of which 37 (26.4%) were graded as strong but supported with only C or D level of evidence. The most commonly reported type of information in the recommendations was indication (n = 499, 82.5%). The most commonly addressed type of off-label drug use in the 523 positive recommendations was unapproved population (n = 255, 48.8%). Sixty-nine (11.4%) recommendations explicitly reported the drug use as off-label. Conclusion: Children may be exposed to medical risks due to gaps in reporting and evidence of off-label drug use recommendations in pediatric guidelines.

Keywords: children; evidence-based medicine; off-label use of drugs; pediatric guidelines; recommendations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Guideline screening process.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The types of references cited to support the recommendations.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Strength of the off-label drug use recommendations and quality of the supporting evidence according to the GRADE grading system.

References

    1. Abbas M., Pires D., Peters A., Morel C. M., Hurst S., Holmes A. (2018). Conflicts of Interest in Infection Prevention and Control Research: No Smoke without Fire. A Narrative Review. Intensive Care Med. 44 (10), 1679–1690. 10.1007/s00134-018-5361-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agrawal S., Vamadevan P., Mazibuko N., Bannister R., Swery R., Wilson S., et al. (2019). A New Method for Ethical and Efficient Evidence Generation for Off-Label Medication Use in Oncology (A Case Study in Glioblastoma). Front. Pharmacol. 10, 681. 10.3389/fphar.2019.00681 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen H. C., Garbe M. C., Lees J., Aziz N., Chaaban H., Miller J. L., et al. (2018). Off-Label Medication Use in Children, More Common Than We Think: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J. Okla State Med. Assoc. 111 (8), 776–783. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management (2004). Classifying Recommendations for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Pediatrics 114 (3), 874–877. 10.1542/peds.2004-1260 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews J. C., Schünemann H. J., Oxman A. D., Pottie K., Meerpohl J. J., Coello P. A., et al. (2013). GRADE Guidelines: 15. Going from Evidence to Recommendation-Determinants of a Recommendation's Direction and Strength. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 66 (7), 726–735. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources