Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 9:4:898720.
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.898720. eCollection 2022.

Daily Fluid Intake Behaviors and Associated Health Effects Among Australian and United States Populations

Affiliations

Daily Fluid Intake Behaviors and Associated Health Effects Among Australian and United States Populations

Jesse N L Sims et al. Front Sports Act Living. .

Abstract

Minimal data exist exploring intercontinental differences in fluid intake (FI) beliefs and behaviors and the impact on fluid intake practices (i.e., fluid intake volume, beverage type, and timing of fluid intake). Therefore, this study explored the impact that FI beliefs and behaviors had on FI practices among emerging adults living in the United States (USA) and Australia (AUS). A total of 489 individuals (74.5% female; USA, 79.4%; age, 25 ± 6 years completed a 23-item survey between November 2020 and June 2021). Participants detailed their FI practices. FI beliefs were evaluated to determine their contribution to FI behaviors across the day. Multinomial and multiple linear regression analyses explored the association of daily FI beliefs and behaviors across multiple domains. Independent sample t-tests and chi-square analyses were conducted to compare FI practices, beliefs, and behaviors between individuals in the USA and AUS. FI behaviors were significantly different between countries, with the USA more likely to consume fluids to meet a total target volume (β = 1.150, p = 0.036) and consume fluid at the same time as structured daily activities (β = 0.773, p = 0.046) compared to FI alongside food intake. However, there were no differences in the types of beverage consumed (juice, sugar-sweetened beverages, tea, and coffee), total fluid volume, and physical activity (PA) between countries (p > 0.05). Beverage consumption was higher among USA than AUS residents for water, beer, and wine (p < 0.05). Total fluid consumption was greater among males (3,189 ± 2,407 ml) than females (2,215 ± 1,132 ml; β = 3.61, p < 0.001), individuals who regularly consumed fluid during the day to meet a targeted volume (β = 1,728.5, p < 0.001), and those who regularly consumed fluid as a habitual behavior (β = 3.97, p < 0.001) compared to those individuals who only consumed fluid alongside mealtimes (β = 1,041.7, p < 0.001). FI behaviors differed between the USA and AUS; however, total volume consumed, type of beverage consumed, and FI beliefs were similar. FI practices and behaviors appear to be individualized and context-specific among the studied populations.

Keywords: fluid intake; fluid intake behavior; health; hydration; water.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant inclusion in final sample based on response.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fluid intake volume [Mean (SD)] by beverage type. Assessed by Independent sample t-tests and chi-square analyses. USA, black; SSB, sugar-sweetened beverages.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Multinomial model derived probabilities of fluid intake responses to the question on fluid frequency, given total fluid intake after controlling for country, gender, moderate–vigorous physical activities, and chronic health condition.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Multinomial model derived probabilities of fluid intake responses to the question on fluid frequency, given moderate–vigorous physical activities after controlling for country, gender, total fluid intake, and chronic health condition.

References

    1. Acton R., Vanderlee L., Adam J., Kirkpatrick S., Pedraza L., Sacks G. (2021). Tax awareness and perceived cost of sugar-sweetened beverages in four countries between 2017 and 2019: findings from the international food policy study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 19, 38. 10.1186/s12966-022-01277-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker A. (2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, Vol. 323. Washington, DC: British Medical Journal Publishing Group. 10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1192 - DOI
    1. Baker L. B., Jeukendrup A. E. (2014). Optimal composition of fluid-replacement beverages. Compr. Physiol. 4, 575–620. 10.1002/cphy.c130014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carroll H. A., Davis M. G., Papadaki A. (2015). Higher plain water intake is associated with lower type 2 diabetes risk: a cross-sectional study in humans. Nutr. Res. 35, 865–872. 10.1016/j.nutres.2015.06.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chaloupka F. J., Powell L. M., Chriqui J. F. (2011). Sugar-sweetened beverages and obesity: the potential impact of public policies. J. Policy Anal. Manage. 30, 645–655. 10.1002/pam.20587 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources